Talk:Wikimania05/Presentation-SS1

History on en.wikibooks prior to transwiki:

   * 01:56, 29 August 2005 . . Fuzheado (only half here)
   * 02:50, 24 August 2005 . . 84.191.85.127 (Overview)
   * 10:42, 8 August 2005 . . 62.206.65.6
   * 10:42, 8 August 2005 . . 62.206.65.6
   * 10:41, 8 August 2005 . . 62.206.65.6
   * 09:24, 8 August 2005 . . 62.206.65.6 (+ presentation link)
   * 21:10, 29 July 2005 . . 69.194.119.144
   * 21:08, 29 July 2005 . . 69.194.119.144
   * 21:08, 29 July 2005 . . 69.194.119.144
   * 21:04, 29 July 2005 . . 69.194.119.144 ("done" for now)
   * 21:03, 29 July 2005 . . 69.194.119.144 ("done" for now)
   * 20:55, 29 July 2005 . . 69.194.119.144 (I got a reprieve from the gf. "done"--for onw)
   * 20:42, 29 July 2005 . . 69.194.119.144
   * 19:58, 29 July 2005 . . 69.194.119.144 (will be continued tomorrow morning... I have to rewrite this as my last version was lost in an edit conflict. What's with that? I thought MediaWiki had this fixed.)
   * 19:55, 29 July 2005 . . 69.194.119.144 (have to leave it at this point until the morning)
   * 19:39, 29 July 2005 . . 69.194.119.144
   * 19:17, 29 July 2005 . . 69.194.119.144
   * 19:16, 29 July 2005 . . 69.194.119.144 (starting again (sigh; I could cry))
   * 18:37, 29 July 2005 . . 66.207.204.177 (goddammit)
   * 18:14, 29 July 2005 . . Fuzheado (which one? added two titles)
   * 18:13, 29 July 2005 . . Fuzheado (templateize)
   * 18:20, 3 July 2005 . . JakobVoss
   * 15:45, 21 June 2005 . . JakobVoss (Sunir Shah)

Discussion History:

   * (cur) (last) 02:11, 1 August 2005 Rosskurator
   * (cur) (last) 02:07, 1 August 2005 Rosskurator (correlation very weak)

---

Correlation very weak

Hi Sunir. I'm looking forward to your presentation. I'm honored to be cited in it:-). There's a small inaccuracy:

• You write: "Brändle's research indicates that controversy is not correlated with quality". Correct is: "...is correlated only very weakly with quality ".

• You write: "Brändle (2005) measured controversy as simply the intensity of the discussion, and it had no impact on the final quality of the article". Correct is: "...very weak impact on..."

The Correlation from Controversy with quality richness (if the influence of interest and topic relevance is calculated out) is at around r=0.15. This is not much and closely to no influence (1=perfect correlation, 0 =no correlation). So I don't know if you wanna leave it as it is to make your point.

If you need some more information on my research just send me your questions or contact me at Wikimania. I'm going to be there form Thursday to Sunday. Andreas.