Template:IEG/Committee/Review/Score

Proposal review: scores, comments and feedback

This template was used to post aggregated feedback from the committee to a proposal's talk page (and so it still needs to work on some of the oldest IEG proposals). It has now been replaced by Template:IEG/Committee/Review/Score/2 for all new rounds of IEG.

==Aggregated feedback from the committee for ''(project name)''==
{{IEG/Committee/Review/Score
| A score=
| B score=
| C score=
| D score=
| E score=
| F score=
| G score=
| H score=
| I score=
| J score=
| K score=
| L score=
| comments=
}}
__TOC__

Scoring criteria (see the rubric for background)	Score 1=weakest 5=strongest
Potential for impact
(A) The project fits with the Wikimedia movement's strategic priorities
(B) The project has the potential to lead to significant online impact.
(C) The impact of the project can be sustained after the grant ends.
(D) The project has potential to be scaled or adapted for other languages or projects.
Ability to execute
(E) The project has demonstrated interest from a community it aims to serve.
(F) The project can be completed as scoped within 6 months with the requested funds.
(G) The budget is reasonable and an efficient use of funds.
(H) The individual(s) proposing the project have the required skills and experience needed to complete it.
Fostering innovation and learning
(I) The project has innovative potential to add new strategies and knowledge for solving important issues in the movement.
(J) The risk involved in the project's size and approach is appropriately balanced with its potential gain in terms of impact.
(K) The proposed measures of success are useful for evaluating whether or not the project was successful.
(L) The project supports or grows the diversity of the Wikimedia movement.
Comments from the committee: This area will be comments from the committee.