Translations:Community open letter on renaming/10/nl

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
    • Problematische evaluatie en samenvatting van terugkoppeling. De keus van statistieken, in het bijzonder in het "community review" uit augustus 2019, heeft de nauwkeurigheid en legitimiteit van het proces in twijfel getrokken.[1][2][3][4]
  1. Discussion: Flawed indicator for ‘informed people’, 2019-02 - "The community response criteria proposes dividing by the number of people who have been informed. That appears to be a problem. I see no way you can determine how many people have been informed via mailing list or informed via VillagePump postings, unless someone has psychic powers."
  2. Brands - Community Review # Informed people "0.6% of informed oppose (57 users oppose of ~9,000 reached)" (2019-09-06)
  3. Meta: Brands - Community Review - Results # Response KPIs - adjusted to "40% of community members oppose"
  4. Discussion: Brands - Community Review - Results # The metrics used here are troubling- "The metrics used in this consultation were meant to gauge response not to offer a score for the proposal or stand in for a vote of any kind. This was because the proposal was conceptual not explicit." Zack McCune