From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki

MADe's guide to assessing GAC grant requests. Based on .

  1. Has the applicant described a clear outcome through their proposal?
  2. Does the proposal have a clear way of engaging community?
  3. Is the proposed budget appropriate for the project scope?
  4. Does the applicant have a past record of success?
  5. Does the benefit from having travel in the project, if any, merit the additional investment?
  6. If appropriate, does the proposal have clear on-Wiki impact? If not, does the project strategically describe its importance to the online projects?