User talk:2600:387:5:803:0:0:0:A1
6/27 Unblock Request[edit]
Unblock request declined
This blocked user has had their unblock request reviewed by one or more administrators, who has/have reviewed and declined this request. Request reason: stewards emailed but can an admin unblock this range from meta useful contributiors are on this range please don’t null just decline also @Sotiale: there is (1) too much collateral and (2) the vandal probably went to other ranges in 2600:387:5:800::/60 causing you to have to block the whole /60 but this leads to more collateral 2600:387:5:803:0:0:0:A1 20:52, 27 June 2020 (UTC) Decline reason: global (b)locks are managed by stewards; please contact them via stewardswikimediaorg or by using Special:Contact/Stewards and wait for a response. Sgd. —Hasley 01:03, 28 June 2020 (UTC) বাংলা | English | español | français | magyar | italiano | 한국어 | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | українська | 中文 | edit |
to billinghurst[edit]
Special note just for him-please decline and don’t null. By nulling it doesn’t seem as if I Request unblock and this may be critical information 2600:387:5:803:0:0:0:A1 20:52, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
Special Technological Note[edit]
2600:387:5:800::/60, for anyone who cares, consist of anything beginning in 2600:387:5:80X. Try blocking 2600:387:5:800::/61 first which only blocks the 800,801,802,803,804,805,806 and 807. The 805 and 807 are also abusive. This doesn’t block 80D though. 2600:387:5:803:0:0:0:A1 20:52, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
This is the discussion page for an anonymous user who has not created an account yet, or who does not use it. We therefore have to use the numerical IP address to identify them. Such an IP address can be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user and feel that irrelevant comments have been directed at you, please create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users. |