User talk:2600:387:5:803:0:0:0:A1

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki

6/27 Unblock Request[edit]

×
Unblock request declined

This blocked user has had their unblock request reviewed by one or more administrators, who has/have reviewed and declined this request.
Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason.
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Request reason: stewards emailed but can an admin unblock this range from meta useful contributiors are on this range please don’t null just decline also @Sotiale: there is (1) too much collateral and (2) the vandal probably went to other ranges in 2600:387:5:800::/60 causing you to have to block the whole /60 but this leads to more collateral 2600:387:5:803:0:0:0:A1 20:52, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason: global (b)locks are managed by stewards; please contact them via stewards@wikimedia.org or by using Special:Contact/Stewards and wait for a response. Sgd. —Hasley 01:03, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


বাংলা | English | español | français | magyar | italiano | 한국어 | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | українська | 中文 | edit

to billinghurst[edit]

Special note just for him-please decline and don’t null. By nulling it doesn’t seem as if I Request unblock and this may be critical information 2600:387:5:803:0:0:0:A1 20:52, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Special Technological Note[edit]

2600:387:5:800::/60, for anyone who cares, consist of anything beginning in 2600:387:5:80X. Try blocking 2600:387:5:800::/61 first which only blocks the 800,801,802,803,804,805,806 and 807. The 805 and 807 are also abusive. This doesn’t block 80D though. 2600:387:5:803:0:0:0:A1 20:52, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]