User talk:Baya
With all respect, I don't agree. However, if you find out a consensus or guideline (consensus is an organized discussion to figure out how to approach better the guidelines, frequently confused with voting by newcomers) or achieve a new consensus backing your idea to keep the dates, throw me a word and I'd gladly copypaste all the dates. And I'd even find out the dates of the people who never wrote it. The idea is to stick with a format as much as possible.
I won't just reverse the page, too much of the requested clean up was made after I took of the dates, but I'd take the job to put back all dates myself.
By the way, all proposals end in ".org" but only rodovid is including that in its proposal page. Unless there is a rodovid.com, there is probably no reason to go against style formats. Tanks and regards. --T-man 19:45, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
Rodovid[edit]
rodovid.org seems to be down. Do you know why? (I'm assuming you're the person to go to for this as you proposed the project.) --Yair rand 06:17, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
Please visit this page if you wish to contribute to a centralized discussion about a Wikimedia genealogy project. Thank you! --Another Believer (talk) 21:47, 26 February 2014 (UTC)