User talk:Dmitrismirnov

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Blake problems[edit]

[1] FYI, you took out third party summaries and put in quotes. That is original research and unencyclopedic. You also introduced a lot of grammatical problems and statements that aren't backed up by sources. You can't go stanza by stanza either, and the formatting is really screwed up. I recommended to others to fully revert because of how many problems you created. Ottava Rima (talk) 13:11, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

I prefer to discuss this in Wikipedia. Why here? And sorry for my grammar. English is not my first language. Dmitrismirnov (talk) 15:01, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
I answered to you here:
Your additions are factually wrong, inappropriate, and your explanation is wrong. Everything that was in the original page is per the source. You also expanded the poem page far beyond what is acceptable. Have you actually read the MoS or other poetry pages? Your actions and behavior on many pages leave me wondering if you are altering things inappropriately on purpose. I am baffled how you could claim the original page didn't get something right on the source when you blatantly altered things to say opposite of their source material. Ottava Rima (talk) 17:48, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
By the way, you outright lied about Damon. Everything I cited him to is from the work but you then plagiarized from him. Original research, plagiarism, ridiculous phrasing, falsifying what sources say and other behavior is not appropriate. Ottava Rima (talk) 04:00, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Superprotect status[edit]

Dear Dmitrismirnov, since you are an administrator on a wiki from which no user participated in this discussion, I'd like to make sure you are aware of some recent events which may alter what the Wikimedia Foundation lets you do on your wiki: Superprotect.

Peteforsyth 09:11, 12 September 2014 (UTC)