User talk:Rdicerb (WMF)/sandbox/CL Toolkit/Epic Newsletter

Accuracy in the different sections

Wanting to check this for accuracy. Elitre (WMF) and Whatamidoing (WMF), wanted to check to see if this looks reasonable or if there are any glaring omissions.

This information has been collated from your office-wiki, other team office wikis around translation workflows, etc and modified to be a little more universal to fit with other products. -Rdicerb (WMF) (talk) 17:48, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

I'm confused. Does this need to reflect accurately the current VE process? --Elitre (WMF) (talk) 13:35, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

I had intended it to be accurate to the current VE process while remaining universal enough that someone could create a newsletter around a different product without being too caught up in VE's specific pages and details. From your message, Elitre (WMF), I suspect I failed :/

What I mean is, if you were going to create a new newsletter specifically for Product X, does this show you how to do so while listing the steps with relative accuracy? I'm sure that it probably needs some help, of course, but it is on track, at least? -Rdicerb (WMF) (talk) 21:47, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

I made changes. Feel free to discard them. I'd rather see the specific process fully documented and explained, including for example peculiar communication choices (why I maintain and contact a certain pool of translators rather than using the system everybody else is using, for example). --Elitre (WMF) (talk) 10:41, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Thank you so much! -Rdicerb (WMF) (talk) 17:32, 25 March 2016 (UTC)