User talk:SchoolcraftT

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki

IRC Ban removal[edit]

As you know I've been the victim of some rather ridiculous Irc Bans in the past three months. I'm sick and tired of it. I'm tring to gesome help on a problem and theese bans keep comming up where there not wanted sorta speak.

The accusation of trolling is completely false. I send message out and I wait for responses, and tat I'm igored and waiting for a response to my question doesn't constitute trolling.

Please refrain form such action and revert all of the troll-related ban in a timely manor (unless probable cause is given otherwise).

SchoolcraftT 16:43, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In addition to the above, all accounts that bear the username SchoolcraftT (with the excepion of this one) is to be retired effective imediately.SchoolcraftT 18:35, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You've been indefinitely banned at en.wiki and Commons and had multiple requests for unblocking denied due to your continued abuse. You continue to use sockpuppets to circumvent your bans. Your further requests for unbanning are a waste of editor and administrator resources. Bitmapped 18:45, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Your personal attacks (incuding the above) are not going unnoticed, and you have forced me to take action. Don't even try to tell me that you wern't because I know better. Your copright vio accusatopn was udderly bogus. I took it myself so don't try to say otherwise. 12:40, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Vandalism on Steward requests/Global page[edit]

Please note, that page deals with some serious business. Global blocks are for cross-wiki abuse. If you found an user who abuses his editing privileged on a particular wiki, then request for block on that wiki. — Tanvir • 15:30, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

only problem is that I can't due to vandalism and the subsequent revocation of my en-wiki and commmons talkpages.SchoolcraftT 16:37, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Besides, this user's behaviors are serious enough to warrent a global block (lock). SchoolcraftT 12:16, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Request for the immediate block of Bitmapped[edit]

I'm a concerned user who has been a victim of personal attacks and vandalism from user Bitmapped. It has been going on for almost a year. He has contiously done theese behaviors to a point where he has caused the revocation of my commons talk page. He need to be blocked before he can cause more dammage. SchoolcraftT 13:27, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism[edit]

I had noticed yesterday that an entire topic and part of another had been reverted for no logical reason. To me this is vandalism thats fairly ovious. This is what led to the revocation of two of my talkpages. I'm not going to let that happen again. If you want to comment about something, just do so. Just don't vandalise this page, It will not be tolerated anymore. SchoolcraftT 12:08, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you insist on reverting something on this page, let me know before hand. SchoolcraftT 12:11, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Extention of request for user:bitmapped's imediate block[edit]

I would like the request for blocking user:bitmapped to be extended to en-wikki and to commons for the same reason (Personal attacks and Vandalism).SchoolcraftT 17:44, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

copyright info=[edit]

I know that there were copyright conserns consering Stanley Anderson's permission e-mail, and this is to confirm that the copyright is not for a person, but for an organization, the Northern Webster Co Improvement council Inc which I'm representing in theese copyright discussions.SchoolcraftT 19:38, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Willing to talk about blocks[edit]

To all admins on commons and en-wiki

In the past year, I have been the victium of numerouse persal attacks pertaing to my blocks. I am willing to talk, but banning me from IRC Chanells and revolking my talk pages arent cutting it with me.I am willing to talk to you about your conserns, just metion them to me, not any of the junk metioned earlier.

Don't do anything that might bite you later.SchoolcraftT 15:16, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unprovoked Irc Ban[edit]

Once again I been the victum of unprovoked IRC ban. It becoming not only excessive, but its destroing my communication opitons from admins that I trust. Please stop this IMEDIATELY.19:16, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

As I said before, the accustions of trolling and now spamming, are udderly false. I have ignored thesse attacks for a while, but it getting to be where enuough id enough. DOn't push ne to that point 15:11, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Copyright problem with File:100 0164.JPG[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:100 0164.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at this page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Courcelles 20:59, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]


The file also lacks author information. If you intend to use this file on any other project, it would be better to upload to the Wikimedia Commons, and have the version here on Meta deleted. Courcelles 20:59, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Poor man's talk back. Courcelles 22:08, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I see you uploaded this again here on Meta as File:100 0162.JPG. I still think you're looking for Commons. That is available at [1]. Thanks. Courcelles 23:36, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
its a completely differnt file 23:44, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
i was wondering if somone can move this file? SchoolcraftT 23:50, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Aleged Copyright Vio[edit]

A few months ago an image similar to the one on the right as well as others was wrongfully deleted:

File:Mountain Parkway - Hacker Valley Kiosk.JPG


I had taken it with a camera that dosen't porduce metadata (a Concord Eye digital camera). This was done by means of vandaslim. There needs to be a policy against marking images like mine as copyright vio that realy aren't.

SchoolcraftT 09:04, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but all Concorde Eye cams supports DCF-standard which includes EXIF. --WizardOfOz talk 08:39, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

IF it was one of the newer ons, i would agree, but this one apparenly dosen't, and as a result the commons admins made a mistake, an honset one at that. Bitmapped was the one who cried copyright vio in the wrong and he should be punished for it.SchoolcraftT 09:45, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

At first, this image is out of scope for meta. At the second the older Concorde Eye cams without EXIF don´t have 6MP resolution. So deleted. --WizardOfOz talk 18:29, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
There is no possible way thats a 6 MP, beside thats not the image I'm talking about anyway, It was exactly like the one show. SchoolcraftT 17:03, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
also iy was fraudulently marked as a copyright vio in the eye of the law. SchoolcraftT 13:32, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsense[edit]

The posing http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Administrators%27_noticeboard&oldid=54795202#User:SchoolcraftT_uploading_at_other_wikis_to_circumvent_block is garbage. There was no attempt to circumvent anything. This is a PA in every sense, and its going to stop right now. Please stiop refrencing this to anyone including me. SchoolcrafftT 15:07, 22 November 2011 (UTC)~

Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SchoolcraftT&oldid=3102050"