Jump to content

위키미디어 재단 선거/2022년/가맹단체 참여/후보자 질문/질문5

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki

향후 5년 동안 가맹단체의 역할이 어떻게 변화하기를 바라십니까?

이 질문은 2022년 이사회 선거의 가맹단체 대표들이 제안하고 선택했습니다. 질문과 답변의 번역은 운동 전략 포럼에서 찾을 수 있습니다.

Farah Jack Mustaklem (Fjmustak)

I’d like to see the birth of regional or thematic hubs within the next five years, which will bring together affiliates. This will be especially beneficial to smaller affiliates with limited resources.

Mike Peel (Mike Peel)

I hope to see more affiliates becoming stable and established organisations with sufficient capacity to make significant changes in their focus geographies/topics to benefit Wikimedia globally, in partnership with the WMF. I would particularly like to see affiliates taking active roles with development and support of the sister projects.

Gilbert Ndihokubwayo (Gilbert Ndihokubwayo)

In the next five years, I would like to see the role of affiliates being inclusive and representative of the Wikimedia Foundation mission; abide by the Wikimedia Universal Code of Conduct. Affiliates effectively support the Wikimedia Foundation's tasks and have the needed skills to contribute and share free knowledge on Wikimedia projects.

Tobechukwu Precious Friday (Tochiprecious)

I would like to see Affiliates representing pure governance. They should be the closest representation of Wiki Governance to their immediate communities.

Lionel Scheepmans (Lionel Scheepmans)

Affiliate have to get more financial Independence and not following the way of the foundation how created a big staff company. The status of volunteer is the best one to assume our mission of sharing knowledge. The money coming in our movement create a lot of tasks that don't have any concern with this mission. More we have to deal with money, more we have to deal with conflict of interest and risk of corruption. There is no need of a lot of money in a movement based on sharing.

Abderamane Abakar Brahim (Abakar B)

The affiliates will evolve in the next 5 by appropriating the new Technology and facilitating learning

Joris Darlington Quarshie (Joris Darlington Quarshie)

In the next 5-8 years I will like to see the role of Affiliates becoming more equitable, inclusive and transparent. I will like to see Affiliates growing up to become larger collaborators of the Wikimedia Foundation especially younger affiliates developing the skills and capabilities needed to grow and expand their movement.

Egbe Eugene Agbor (Eugene233)

No response yet.

Kunal Mehta (Legoktm)

I would like to see the role of affiliates continue to grow with more affiliates take on bigger leadership roles (e.g. as WMDE has taken on some technical leadership with Wikidata and the Technical Wishes project). I'd also like to see more already established groups become officially recognized affiliates (e.g. "functionaries", IRC operators/users, etc.) to give them more visibility and suffrage.

Shani Evenstein Sigalov (Esh77)

I’d like to see:

  • Our Movement developing mechanisms to better support affiliates
  • WMF develop a clear strategy of working with affiliates, properly addressing their needs, and helping affiliates develop the necessary skills for better governance, both strategically and operationally
  • Affiliates further mature, participate more and share the responsibility of the governance of the movement
  • Affiliates taking on certain roles, traditionally considered WMF-realm but don’t really have to be, and actively participate in solving some of the bigger challenges we have been facing as a movement.
  • Younger affiliates mature and develop relevant skills and capabilities to help grow future movement leaders

Gina Bennett (Redwidgeon)

I would like to see more affiliate groups and greater inclusivity within the groups. Ideally, I think, it could be useful if every new editor or contributor could be invited to join an affiliate group.

Michał Buczyński (Aegis Maelstrom)

Within 5 years affiliates should be:

  • more active and widespread, serving a larger number of audiences
  • better resourced and supported by the ecosystem and themselves (WMF, hubs and peers)
  • fairly evaluated and developed
  • based on volunteers trained by the ecosystem thanks to the funding secured
  • bold to experiment
  • held accountable and more interconnected with the Movement, including the WMF, hubs, consortia etc. taking part in the network. More involved in shaping the governance model
  • commited to the Movement, values, strategy and audiences.