Proposals for closing projects/Closure of Nahuatl Wikibooks

The result of the following proposal for closing a WMF project is to CLOSE the project. Please, do not modify this page.

The following discussion is closed: Close. No content activity since September 2007, only 4 good pages = no content — VasilievVV 16:17, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I propose to close this discussion in 7 days from now. --MF-W 11:31, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The only activity on the Nahuatl wikibooks is the index.php spambot. Ahoerstemeier 11:39, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

support[edit]

Support no content (b:nah:Special:Allpages) and no recent useful activity (b:nah:Special:Recentchanges) --A. B. ^(talk) 14:41, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support no content and no activity. --Jorunn 22:27, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Don't matter if the other project in same language have articles; this don't have. — Slade ♠ 21:59, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose[edit]

Oppose Many projects such as the Nahuatl Wikipedia itself remained years useless. Started in August 17, 2003, it had around 200 articles by late 2006. Now it has 3700. It just needed someone to keep it alive. In this case, just five users.--Fluence 20:52, 12 September 2007 (UTC-5)
Oppose As other projects, The Nahuatl Wikipedia will need a Wikibooks page soon, the improvement and growing of the project have significance.--Kanon6917 21:03, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Ack Fluence. -- AlimanRuna 10:36, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Even if it's a different project from Wikipedia, it's obvious: if you've got more users working on the language's Wikipedia, that means there are people interested in the project, thus, the language.--Fluence

Oppose it seems, this project found an active user. --birdy geimfyglið _{(:> )=|} 17:40, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose A active user contributions to this Wikibooks. It can't be closed. Xazoj CoospojQuitlc: Ccaxjoj Iteja Z Iti Poop 17:55, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Now has a small amount of relevant activity -- plus the potential of growing after its Wikipedia grows. --Coppertwig 20:21, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
taenge sloeting: Bad idea. Recently a little bit activity + less spam (dealt by Drini) + little content in Nahuatl = Nahuatl Wikibooks. --OosWesThoesBes 06:53, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I oppose this - because I agree with the above. --Anonymous Dissident^Talk 07:01, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Same reasons as Fluence. --Piolinfax ^(@es.wikt) 18:46, 12 April 2008 (UTC)