Meta:Requests for CheckUser information

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
←Requests and proposals Requests for CheckUser information on Meta (for other wikis please go to here) Archives (current)→
Shortcut:
RfCU
This page allows you to request CheckUser information on Meta. When adding new requests, please use the {{checkuser}} template to list the user names in question and {{checkip}} for IP adresses, which simplifies investigation. For example, "{{checkuser|Jimbo Wales}}" will result in:

Jimbo Wales (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser • CentralAuth • AllContribs)
Checkuser icons
These indicators are used by CheckUsers and stewards for easier skimming of their notes, actions and comments.
Confirmed Confirmed MoreInfo Additional information needed
Likely Likely Deferred Deferred to
Possible Possible Completed Completed
Unlikely Unlikely Note Note:
Unrelated Unrelated Doing Doing...
Inconclusive Inconclusive Stale Stale
Declined Declined Fishing CheckUser is not for fishing
Pixiedust CheckUser is not magic pixie dust 8ball The CheckUser Magic 8-Ball says
Duck It looks like a duck to me Crystalball CheckUser is not a crystal ball


Contents

[edit] Requests for Meta only

[edit] Desempates

Please check if Desempates[1] is related to Maddox[2] (please check in meta and wiki-pt). I have several suspicions that tie is an account used to circumvent the blocking of Maddox. I have some experience in deceive the checkuser, I know this is possible, but it is also possible to identify the geographic location of the accounts is the same. Here are several evidences indicated that Maddox is Desempates, but because of this check a who pointed "unrelated", some users no longer suspect of relations of accounts. See the evidences:

Time of account creation

Desempates made his first contribution in November 20, six days before the lock one month Maddox applied to a block that was more than previsible. During the month of November, edit offs often participating in discussions notabily criteria are well known, deletion of pages, like Maddox did.

Areas of unusual interest

Maddox was known about comics and television editing and TV-offs seem to like too, even attending an elimination voting on the subject. (Less than a month of registry)

Markings on quick elimination redirects with a history

Desempates marked redirects to History thing that Maddox has had and one of the disputes that led to me (Marcus Luccas). The redirect-labeled for ER, Desempates were also done by Marcus Luccas (I).

Fanaticism in scoring E.S.R.

Desempates whith less than one month record registered an various pages on the same subject for disposal semirrápida, which is why the lock had surrendered months before Maddox.

Requests of block against multiple users and disagreements with Marcus Luccas / Quintinense (I)

Desempates also very agile ask [blockages, even with the same so to speak Maddox's.

Insist of delete pages Marcus Luccas/Quintinense

Desempates also asked for quick elimination a page created by Marcus Luccas when the Jbribeiro1 the discussion he said "Any user is interested in moving this text to a personal page itself? The Quintinense not return anytime soon around here (and in turn, will xilindró pro again). The work looks good and need not be lost. Arthemius?". The proposition ERnesse again if it was not consensual, something characteristic of Maddox.

Language very similar to the Maddox

Also in pt:Wikipédia:Esplanada/propostas/Definição de critérios de notoriedade para sobrenomes (8dez2011) Desempates (has less than a month) shows extreme knowledge of Wikipedia's policies, such as "Wikipedia is not a primary source of data , "and" Wikipedia is not a dictionary, "(Maddox often cited pt:WP:WNE).

Alternate hours editing

Take into account also the days and hours in which both edit because offs and Maddox never edit while allowing change of geographic location or at least computer. When Maddox was blocked last time it was different than hitherto not requested review of the blockade, but was defended in its discussion page for playoffs, as seen from the section below.

Desempates instransigente defense of Maddox

When Maddox is blocked, Desempates will defend him and also here (WARNING THIS).

"Coincidences" detected by other user

Belanidia and Heitor seem to have realized, though not explicitly stated, be a case of Duck.

Importance

Atually the community discusses the 11º block of the user Maddox (see). The debate may be influenced by the account Desempates. Moreover, the blockade fraud may be being made ​​to perpetuate the destabilizing behavior of the user, previously disapproved by the community. In August, Maddox rounded a block, as can be seen in pt:Wikipédia:Pedidos a administradores/Discussão de bloqueio/Maddox/5 through the IP 201.75.67.198. He confirm the rounded a block, but no reblocked by its block has been canceled.

I ask you here to assess the merits of the application, not who is asking. And please do a thorough evaluation of results, paying attention to the possibility of the user to edit the home of a friend, public computer, or even lend a friend your password to another location edit for a time, to foil any checkusers. Keep in mind the importance of this case to the Wiki-pt, as the number of conflicts with other users is very high. Already, thanks! Quintinense 22:53, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

  • Is there any abuse taking place on Meta where you are requesting this check be ran? Tiptoety talk 06:50, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
  • Right, that's what I am getting at. Unless there is abuse taking place on Meta, this is not the appropriate place to request a CheckUser. Tiptoety talk 17:59, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
  • Tomorrow I response whith diffs. There is abuse in meta also. Quintinense 19:41, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
  • See the historic of the check user reqest, Maddox and Desempates use the page to reforce POV. Moreover, Tiptoety carried out a check in this page in my accounts and I never committed any abuse in Meta. The request was based entirely on the problems pt-wiki. I urge that as in my check, be clear whether the relationship between users is really "unrelated" or "possible", "likely", "inconclusive" etc because given the evidence, it is a great DUCK. Quintinense 11:58, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Abusive usernames

Please checkuser these abusive usernames and block the underlying IP address. Thanks in advance. Trijnstel 19:43, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Done. -Barras 19:57, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Quintinense

Please check the dezestabilizator users. Quintinense request check of user Maddox. Well, this reason of check is very familliar. Marcus Luccas have big history of conflicts with Maddox and Desempates. Southstock also. Marcus Luccas, the dezestabilizator user was conflict with Desempates and Maddox is sock of Quintinense, the user also conflict with Maddox and the requested checkuser. Thanks. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 189.100.69.197 (talk • contribs) 19:10, 13 January 2012‎ (UTC)

Not done Not done - Not of interest for meta. I'm not going to join the party of ptwiki people accusing each other of being a sock. -> SRCU. -Barras 19:19, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

[edit] See also

Requests for: permissions (global) — bot status — CheckUser information (local) — deletion (speedy deletions: local | multilingual) — translation — logos — URL blacklisting — username changes (local) — SUL problem solving — new languages — adminship on Meta — comments — interwiki map — an account on WMF wiki — help from a Meta sysop or bureaucrat

Retrieved from "http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Meta:Requests_for_CheckUser_information&oldid=3240036"
Personal tools
Variants
Actions
Navigation
Community
Beyond the Web
Print/export
Toolbox