Requests for new languages/Wikisource Min Dong 2

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Min Dong Wikisource [edit]

main page Requests for new languages (Wikisource Min Dong 2)
submitted verification final decision
Applications-system.svg This language has been verified as eligible.
The language is eligible for a project, which means that the subdomain can be created once there is an active community and a localized interface, as described in the language proposal policy. You can discuss the creation of this language project on this page. (See an unofficial analysis of this request.)

Contents

Proposal summary
  • Language details: Min Dong (Mìng-dĕ̤ng-ngṳ̄, cdo ISO 639-3)
  • Editing community: GnuDoyng (NP), cdo-wp:Chbu (N)
    List your user name if you're interested in editing the wiki. Add "N" next to your
    name if you are a native speaker of this language.
  • Relevant pages: —
  • External links:
Please read the handbook for requesters for help using this template correctly.

Much written material of Min Dong is available, and Min Dong Wikisource will certainly let more people know about it. Previous discussions are all positive. --GnuDoyng 13:55, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Arguments in favor [edit]

  • Strong supportMin Dong, like Min Nan, has plenty of speakers, some people may have encrypted writings which can be used for the development of this Wikisource.A-yao 01:16, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Arguments against [edit]

  • {{oppose}}: Please start inserting new texts at the http://wikisource.org; See also http://wikisource.org/wiki/Wikisource:Language_domain_requests/Rules_for_voting. 555 02:46, 1 December 2006 (UTC) I'm removing the oppose due to this (I don't have anything against this language, I only need to all going to be done orderly) 555 23:57, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Oppose: per 555. --Aphaia 08:56, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Oppose per above. Please go to Multilingual Wikisource first.--Jusjih 15:20, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Oppose - only a Bible being contributed so far. Please obtain more contributors, and a wider selection of texts. John Vandenberg 11:23, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Oppose, this project has now been proposed almost three years ago and the localisation is still very bad and the test project is quite empty and inactive. --OosWesThoesBes 13:36, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
    • As a proposal it is valid. Opposing it because of a lack of activity does not change it. It will just not be considered for as long as the requirements have not been met. Given the status of eligibility opposing is pointless anyway. Thanks, GerardM 19:46, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

General discussion [edit]

  • Gnu Doyng, Would you please give examples of what you are going to put there?----Hillgentleman 16:53, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Gnu Doyng, is there a chinese form of fuzhou hua? I'm a fuzhounese, but i have difficult time reading romanized fuzhounese, it would be really helpful if you put up a chinese version of fuzhounese. I know there is one, cus i saw it on a teaching website... unsigned by 66.21.135.231 04:44, 26 November 2006.
Hello, for your interest, please check out this link: http://seng-ging.spaces.live.com/
This is where I put Min Dong Bible text before the "cdo.wikisource.org" is granted. --GnuDoyng 11:21, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
I'm putting text here: [1], since I must work on wikisource.org first. --GnuDoyng 15:28, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

Localisation effort [edit]

Currently 38.57% of the MediaWiki messages and 5.23% of the messages used in the extensions used by the Wikimedia Foundation have been localised at Betawiki. Thanks, GerardM 07:22, 4 April 2008 (UTC)