This language has been verified as eligible. The language is eligible for a project, which means that the subdomain can be created once there is an active community and a localized interface, as described in the language proposal policy. You can discuss the creation of this language project on this page.
If you think the criteria are met, but the project is still waiting for approval, feel free to notify the committee and ask them to consider its approval.
The community needs to develop an active test project; it must remain active until approval (automated statistics). It is generally considered active if the analysis lists at least three active, not-grayed-out editors listed in the sections for the previous few months.
"Wikisource talk" (the discussion namespace of the project namespace)
Default is "no". Preferably, files should be uploaded to Commons.
If you want, you can enable local file uploading, either by any user ("yes") or by administrators only ("admin"). Notes: (1) This setting can be changed afterwards. The setting can only be "yes" or "admin" at approval if the test creates an Exemption Doctrine Policy (EDP) first. (2) Files on Commons can be used on all Wikis. (3) Uploading fair-use images is not allowed on Commons (more info). (4) Localisation to your language may be insufficient on Commons.
Oppose: per 555. --Aphaia 08:56, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
Oppose per above. Please go to Multilingual Wikisource first.--Jusjih 15:20, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Oppose - only a Bible being contributed so far. Please obtain more contributors, and a wider selection of texts. John Vandenberg 11:23, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
Oppose, this project has now been proposed almost three years ago and the localisation is still very bad and the test project is quite empty and inactive. --OosWesThoesBes 13:36, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
As a proposal it is valid. Opposing it because of a lack of activity does not change it. It will just not be considered for as long as the requirements have not been met. Given the status of eligibility opposing is pointless anyway. Thanks, GerardM 19:46, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
Gnu Doyng, Would you please give examples of what you are going to put there?----Hillgentleman 16:53, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
Gnu Doyng, is there a chinese form of fuzhou hua? I'm a fuzhounese, but i have difficult time reading romanized fuzhounese, it would be really helpful if you put up a chinese version of fuzhounese. I know there is one, cus i saw it on a teaching website... —unsigned by 188.8.131.52 04:44, 26 November 2006.