Stewards/confirm/2009/Sj

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
< Stewards‎ | confirm‎ | 2009
Jump to: navigation, search
Warning
English: The 2009 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.
Suomi: Vuoden 2009 ylivalvojien vaalit on loppu. Uusia ääniä ei hyväksytä enää.
العربية: انتخابات المضيفين لعام 2009 انتهت. لا أصوات أخرى سيتم قبولها.
Deutsch: Die Stewardwahlen 2009 sind beendet. Weitere Stimmen können nicht mehr berücksichtigt werden.
Ελληνικά: Οι εκλογές επιτρόπων του 2009 έχουν τελειώσει. Δεν γίνονται δεκτές άλλες ψήφοι.
Español: Las elecciones para Steward de 2009 se han concluído. No se consideran los votos emitidos después de esta fecha.
فارسی: .رای‌گیری در مورد انتخابات ویکیبدهای جدید پایان یافته است.رای‌های جدید مورد قبول واقع نخواهد شد.
Français: Les élections de 2009 pour Steward se sont conclues. Aucun vote au-delà de cette date ne sera compté.
Gaeilge: Tá na toghcháin Maoir 2009 dúnta anois. Ní féidir aon vótaí eile a glacadh as an am seo amach.
Galego: Xa remataron as eleccións a steward do ano 2009. Non se aceptarán máis votos.
עברית: בחירות הדיילים לשנת 2009 הסתיימו. הצבעות נוספות לא תתקבלנה.
Magyar: A választás lezárult, további szavazatokat nem fogadunk el.
Italiano: Le elezioni del 2009 a Steward sono finite. Nessun voto ricevuto dopo questa data sarà preso in considerazione.
Nederlands: De stewardsverkiezingen van 2009 zijn gesloten. U kunt niet meer stemmen.
Polski: Wybory stewardów w 2009 roku zakończyły się. Nowe głosy nie będą akceptowane.
Português: As eleições para Steward de 2009 estão encerradas. Nenhum voto lançado a partir desta data será computado.
Русский: Выборы стюардов — 2009 завершены. Дальнейшие голоса не будут приняты.
中文: 2009年监督员选举已经结束。逾期投票将会作废。
‪中文(简体)‬: 2009年监督员选举已经结束。逾期投票将会作废。
‪中文(繁體)‬: 2009年監督員選舉已經結束。逾期投票將會作廢。

[edit] Sj

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, crosswiki | translate: translation help, statement

English:
  • Languages: en, de-2, es-2, fr-2
  • Personal info: statement here


[edit] Comments about Sj

  • Sj made no steward actions at all in 2008. That's not active enough in my book really. And the past 50 rights go back to June 2006. Majorly talk 00:46, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Agreed - clearly inactive.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 01:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Inactive, remove. --APPER 01:53, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Same opinion. Marcus Cyron 01:56, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Inactive, remove. Prodego talk 03:47, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Remove, per Majorly. --Brownout(msg) 09:56, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  • COI I'm also up for confirmation. I've met SJ at Wikimanias and meetups. He is a nice guy and really dedicated to our mission. But no statement and no actions in the last year does satisfy our definition of inactivity. If he comes back during the next election cycle, then I will vote for him. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 15:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  • No steward edits for over a year? Remove. The Helpful One 15:09, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  • These positions really should not be a gold watch and I feel that SJ came close to abusing our trust (although he was probably just being unrealistic with himself) by saying he'd make an effort to be more active. Thanks for all you've done and there's no shame in becoming inactive. But it's now more than a year past time to remove. --JayHenry 04:15, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove, but I understand there are more important things than being online every day ;) →Na·gy 19:44, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Remove. John Vandenberg 06:11, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove no activity.--Kwj2772 06:49, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
  • another dedicated, trusted, inactive user who is prone to overcommitting himself :) SJ has been involved in Wikimedia for a long time and certainly has done much work here; my statement about Oscar, above, applies. -- phoebe 06:10, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove not interested whatsoever in the steward role, therefore should not have it, probably should not have been given it in the first place fr33kman t - c 04:22, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Oppose Não mantem, too inactive. Alex Pereira falaê 16:18, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 04:35, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral aleichem 11:45, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Formally active enough. Too significant to let him leave us as a steward. He didn't leave the statement, but it is so regular behavior of Sj. I may bet that he will write something as a statement during the last moments ;) --Millosh 13:33, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
  • sadly remove - inactivity --FiliP × 17:50, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
Personal tools

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Community
Beyond the Web
Print/export
Toolbox