Talk:Admin activity review/2014

2014?[edit]

More like 2015 at this point. PiRSquared17 (talk) 06:06, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah... --Rs chen 7754 06:16, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

~~I corrected the link on the main page to point here, so that things wouldn't be too confusing with the red link there.~~ --Pxos (talk) 14:13, 13 January 2015 (UTC) Nope, undone. I moved this page instead. Someone who is a translation admin should move all the subpages as well. --Pxos (talk) 14:40, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The data is from 2014, thus AAR2014. Vogone (talk) 16:43, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well no, the review takes place in 2015. It is the review of 2015 and is performed during 2015. --Pxos (talk) 16:49, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The data is from 2013 and 2014. The data of the review 2013 was from 2005–2013. --Pxos (talk) 16:50, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This abusive move-warring should be stopped. --MF-W 17:11, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yeah? Well there is a discussion here where at least I try to submit some valid reasons for moving this page to 2015. Now there are a few broken redirects. Vogone asked "why?" and another urges us to stop move-warring when there is no war. Is there anyone who can discuss properly about the correct year? --Pxos (talk) 17:15, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see a move-warring here. Discussion is still in progress, and as long as the issue is under discussion the status quo may stay. Vogone (talk) 17:21, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The move-warring is to move the back to 2014 without starting a discussion. --MF-W 19:17, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]