Talk:Wikimedia Brasil

Compromise

OK, so after some page moves etc, this clearly could result in conflicts, so I implemented a solution that is hopefully acceptable to all parties :) I put the organizations alphabetically into the table, but please check my Portuguese language, because I suspect there are quite some errors in there!

We should re-evaluate this situation when there is ever an official chapter in Brazil, but as long as that is not the case, a construction like this seems appropriate. Effeietsanders 12:00, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

The only problem is one person out of the Brazilian community, Beria, who wants to impose its ideas on others and not accept the current model, as you can see there are several acts of vandalism, such as edit wars, on all pages related to the subject as Wikimedia São Paulo[1]. Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton ^m 12:06, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

I think it would be helpful if you (or anyone) would not refuge to personal attacks. Fact is that people who look up this page could be wanting to go to either of these organizations, so that is why it is helpful to list all of them equally on the page.

The group of people listed on the chapter proposal page is at least so significant that it is possible that such a chapter forms. I think it is only fair to give all parties a similar treatment. All can help the mission, so lets not strike away either. Effeietsanders 12:13, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Many of the people who signed the list, do not know that there is a discussion on the possible structures, and the Wikimedia Brazil already has activities organized on the site. There would be no problem if the person is not a personal attack is a reality, had not passed over the community, removed the contents and attack the community in all possible places saying we can not do it the way we want, or we can not be Wikimedia Brazil and stuff. In addition, all structures are being discussed, she does not want to dialogue, like all others. Alias ​​not know why she had to touch it, it is not part of the Brazilian community. Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton ^m 12:25, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

I don't intend to defend Beria or you or to make a judgement on who is right here. In general I do think it is good to discuss with each other. However, on this specific page, it is rather about presenting the different pages that people could be looking for or interested in, the exact discussion between those groups is not relevant for that. Effeietsanders 12:38, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

There is no dialogue on one hand, there is a page for this discussion, that only those who defend the current model argues, and as you can see is an open page on Meta, so if she wanted to talk, not to impose her opinion, could be done, but it does not. The only time she was speaking, was to attack the text of Carol. Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton ^m 12:43, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

But you agree that in the current situation, independent whether you like it or not, a disambiguation page like I created is in place? Because that was the original question :). Effeietsanders 12:51, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Maybe so, if it is explicit that there is already occurring activities, there is a discussion on the structures and that most of the Brazilian community that conducts supports the model of Mutirões.Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton ^m 12:56, 13 March 2011 (UTC)