Абстрактна Вікіпедія/Оновлення/2020-11-17

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
This page is a translated version of the page Abstract Wikipedia/Updates/2020-11-17 and the translation is 24% complete.
Оновлення Абстрактної Вікіпедії Translate

Абстрактна Вікіпедія (список розсилки) Абстрактна Вікіпедія в ICR Абстрактна Вікіпедія в Телеграм Wikifunctions on Mastodon Абстрактна Вікіпедія у Твіттері Абстрактна Вікіпедія у Фейсбуці Абстрактна Вікіпедія на Ютубі Сторінка проекту Абстрактні Вікіпедії Translate

Голосування за назву нового проекту Вікімедіа, який буде містити підготовлений авторами каталог функцій, завершено! Дякуємо всім учасникам.
[Оновлення] Ми дуже раді повідомити 22 грудня, що вибрана спільнотою назва „Wikifunctions” (Вікіфункції) буде назвою майбутньої нової вікі.

Голоси проголосували з 320 рахунків, що значно зросло порівняно з 193 виборцями в нашому першому турі.

Використовуючи процес підрахунку голосів, описаний у правилах, встановлено, що найкращим кандидатом у результаті голосування є назва Wikifunctions (Вікіфункції). Ось як пройшло голосування:

After removing the ineligible votes, these were the top preferences of the voters:

  1. Wikifunctions: 84
  2. Wikilambda: 82
  3. Wikimedia Functions: 70
  4. Wikicode: 45
  5. Wikicodex: 16
  6. Wikifusion: 16

We eliminate the two options with the fewest votes, Wikifusion and Wikicodex, and count the top preferences after that elimination:

  1. Wikifunctions: 92
  2. Wikilambda: 89
  3. Wikimedia Functions: 79
  4. Wikicode: 53

That round eliminated Wikicode, resulting in this third round:

  1. Wikifunctions: 126
  2. Wikilambda: 97
  3. Wikimedia Functions: 90

Which lead to the elimination of Wikimedia Functions:

  1. Wikifunctions: 190
  2. Wikilambda: 123

Which finally led to Wikifunctions winning.

The fact that we had to eliminate all options but two shows how tight the vote was.

In order to honor the name Wikilambda, which as you can see also caught quite some attention, and which had a few fiery supporters, we have decided to name the software extension to MediaWiki that we are developing WikiLambda (note the CamelCase, which is normally present in our software tools in honour of our roots in UseMod).

The next step is now to have the Legal department do the in-depth vetting of the name. We aim to have that finalized by mid-December.

Interestingly, should Wikifunctions not be accepted, per the rules of the contest, the runner-up would not be Wikilambda but Wikimedia Functions:

If Wikifunctions is to be eliminated due to legal considerations, this is how the first round would looked like:

  1. Wikimedia Functions: 113
  2. Wikilambda: 94
  3. Wikicode: 63
  4. Wikifusion: 22
  5. Wikicodex: 21

With Wikicodex eliminated, the next round looks as this:

  1. Wikimedia Functions: 117
  2. Wikilambda: 99
  3. Wikicode: 75
  4. Wikifusion: 22

Which eliminates Wikifusion and leads to the following results:

  1. Wikimedia Functions: 125
  2. Wikilambda: 108
  3. Wikicode: 80

Finally, eliminating Wikicode, we see quite a strong lead:

  1. Wikimedia Functions: 176
  2. Wikilambda: 137

The winning proposal of that would be Wikimedia Functions, again with Wikilambda being the apparent follow-up.

We know already that Wikimedia Functions would pass the vetting process (due to the strong trademark that Wikimedia itself is), so we would be able to stop the process there. So the comments about Wikilambda above would stay.

Thanks again for everyone participating in the vote! We are looking forward to finalizing the result, and come back to you within a few weeks.

Once that is closed, we will be setting up the timeline and the process for the logo contest.
We already have community members being eager to start. Feel free to start creating proposals and discussing them! (That draft page is preliminary).
Over the next few weeks we plan to suggest rules for the logo contest, and also to publish some suggestions regarding the potential logo. We are also very excited about these parts coming together!

Дякую вам всім!