Abstract Wikipedia/Wiki of functions naming contest/WikiREPL
Appearance
WikiREPL
[edit]Voting
[edit]- Proposed by ABaso (WMF)
- ย Support --denny (talk) 18:35, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Discussion
[edit]- Probably to technical for some visitors, but I don't think the project will be directly viewed by that many visitors either. What about translatability? ๐๐ค๐ฏ๐บ๐ช๐ค๐๐๐ท๐ฎ๐ฅ๐๐บ๐ด๐๐๐ฐ (๐๐ฎ๐ญ๐ ) 18:49, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- Will the wiki actually have a REPL? PiRSquared17 (talk) 18:51, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- I actually thought about this one also last night before falling asleep!, the entire REPL as a flow, which we definitely will have and currently do! REPL, in general can be thought of as overlapping workflows or just processes. R, read, is the extraction parts that will mostly be automated when the community opt-in to have pages created or maintained. But for a Wiki of Functions, that will only be the E, eval part from REPL, so maybe that's a subtle vote for WikiEval. The P, print, I would say would perhaps be renderers and I quite like that aspect of alignment. L, loop, could be thought of as the continual refinement as well as counter vandalism operations. Overall, REPL is a good way to think of the entire set of workflows or processes that generates knowledge and would probably be a great way to document as an example of those very new to Wikidata/Wikipedia and wondering/hearing about how the "Wiki of Functions" fits into the whole picture. --Thadguidry (talk) 22:14, 17 September 2020 (UTC)