User talk:PiRSquared17

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to: navigation, search


Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Boarisch | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | བོད་ཡིག | bosanski | català | کوردیی ناوەندی | corsu | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | ދިވެހިބަސް | Ελληνικά | emiliàn e rumagnòl | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | Nordfriisk | Frysk | galego | Alemannisch | ગુજરાતી | עברית | हिन्दी | Fiji Hindi | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Ido | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | ភាសាខ្មែរ | 한국어 | Kurdî | Limburgs | lietuvių | Baso Minangkabau | македонски | മലയാളം | молдовеняскэ | Bahasa Melayu | မြန်မာဘာသာ | مازِرونی | नेपाली | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | occitan | Kapampangan | polski | português | Runa Simi | română | русский | sicilianu | سنڌي | සිංහල | slovenčina | slovenščina | Soomaaliga | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ślůnski | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkmençe | Tagalog | Türkçe | татарча/tatarça | ⵜⴰⵎⴰⵣⵉⵖⵜ  | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 吴语 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/-

Support request with team editing experiment project[edit]

Dear tech ambassadors, instead of spamming the Village Pump of each Wikipedia about my tiny project proposal for researching team editing (see here: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IdeaLab/Research_team_editing), I have decided to leave to your own discretion if the matter is relevant enough to inform a wider audience already. I would appreciate if you could appraise if the Wikipedia community you are more familiar with could have interest in testing group editing "on their own grounds" and with their own guidance. In a nutshell: it consists in editing pages as a group instead of as an individual. This social experiment might involve redefining some aspects of the workflow we are all used to, with the hope of creating a more friendly and collaborative environment since editing under a group umbrella creates less social exposure than traditional "individual editing". I send you this message also as a proof that the Inspire Campaign is already gearing up. As said I would appreciate of *you* just a comment on the talk page/endorsement of my project noting your general perception about the idea. Nothing else. Your contribution helps to shape the future! (which I hope it will be very bright, with colors, and Wikipedia everywhere) Regards from User:Micru on meta.

Tech News: 2015-51[edit]

17:42, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Tech News: 2016-42[edit]

16:42, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Notice of removal of adminship[edit]

Hello. I regret to inform you that your administrator rights have been removed given that you've failed to sign on Meta:Administrators/Removal/October 2016 that you wished to keep your adminship. Thanks for your work so far. Hope to see you around in the future again. —MarcoAurelio 15:26, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Tech News: 2016-43[edit]

17:39, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Tech News: 2016-44[edit]

16:18, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

Tech News: 2016-45[edit]

23:01, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Announcing a new mailing list for Meta-Wiki administrators[edit]

Hello!

As a regular administrator on Meta-Wiki, you're allowed to subscribe to the recently created metawiki-admins mailing list. This is a closed mailing list for announcements, asking for help and discussion between Meta-Wiki administrators. If you wish to subscribe, please fill the form at this page and then contact Savh or MarcoAurelio via Special:EmailUser using your administrator account so they can verify the authenticity of your request and address. You'll find more information on the mailing list description page. Should you have any doubts or questions, feel free to contact any of us. We hope that this tool is useful for all.

Best regards,
-- MarcoAurelio and Savh 12:31, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
Mailing list administrators for metawiki-admins mailing list.

Message sent to members of Meta:Administrators/Mass-message list. Please see there to subscribe or unsubscribe from further mass messages directed to the whole group of administrators.

Fix for https://tools.wmflabs.org/pirsquared/iw.php[edit]

Hiho. If you have a few minutes might you be able to fix into place for the interwiki tool look thingy. bd808 says "It looks like this tool is running on a PHP version that is incompatible with the codebase. So the code needs to be fixed or the maintainer needs to pin the webservice to run on the older precise exec nodes." Thanks.  — billinghurst sDrewth 01:22, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

phabricator:T150592#2790492  — billinghurst sDrewth 01:47, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
@Billinghurst: I haven't used tool labs in ages, I don't even think I have the private key for that anymore. Is there something I can do to resolve this? Couldn't you just fork the code (if you can view it)? PiRSquared17 (talk) 04:53, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
One of the labs organisers fixed the code. They added you to the ticket, so I presumed that you saw that fix. Problem is resolved. Re keys, they are managed through your login at wikitech:. Re the code, I am not sure what permissions you put to the code. If you can leave a message that at least grants permission for the code to be transferred or granted to the public, then I can look to migrate it away from your site to a shared site. Thanks.  — billinghurst sDrewth 05:06, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Tech News: 2016-46[edit]

19:17, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

Tech News: 2016-47[edit]

15:33, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Tech News: 2016-48[edit]

21:16, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Tech News: 2016-49[edit]

18:07, 5 December 2016 (UTC)