Abstract Wikipedia/Wikifunctions logo concept/Proposal 22

The lines illustrate lines of code/instructions or reference areas.
The “vertical” style holds two secrets: the shapes form an abstracted “face” and and the lines imply the three ascending strokes of a “W”.
I like the simplicity, yet it tells a story - building something for humans/humanity from diverse elements/atoms.
It works well in different scales. The logo would be inverted on a dark background. You can preview different use cases for the logo in this Google Slide deck – e.g. merchandise, favicon in the browser, presentation, how it looks animated. (I chose this format, so any could copy the slides and try out their logo for these use cases).

Voting[edit]

Voting has closed.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Support Very simple, but there is something to it. Papuass (talk) 08:33, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cantons-de-l'Est (talk) 21:04, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nclm (talk) 21:08, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Maria Sieglinda von Nudeldorf (talk) 22:28, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Simple, yet unique. Similar to the USB logo. Cortex128 (talk) 21:05, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Daniel Mietchen (talk) 03:37, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Original idea. Might work well also in WMF colours. I like how it can be seen as an evolution of the Wikidata barcode logo. YjM (talk) 16:01, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 13:19, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support It looks like a smile ASCII :), circle eye and triangle open mouth. Andrew Krizhanovsky (talk) 08:31, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Bagelpigeon (talk) 17:14, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Quiddity (talk) 17:44, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Matma Rex (talk) 18:07, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.