Category talk:Reader surveys
The title of this category is very opinionated and it's not clear why it would match the current category content. I suggest to rename to a more neutral title. Nemo 07:26, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
- Hi Nemo - I'm categorizing surveys that focused on studying wikimedia readers. Maybe: "Surveys about Wikimedia Readers"? I'd like to group the information in a better way; it was very disorganized and all questionnaire surveys have a target human audience. Happy to hear specific suggestions. Thanks! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 18:40, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Adding surveys without meta pages[edit]
Does anyone have any objections/suggestions if I had some external links to surveys that lack meta pages. That way this category is more useful for people trying to quickly find all the reader surveys (not just the ones with meta pages). So it doesn't blow up to be every survey ever, I'm only including surveys that either went to an entire language edition (e.g., via CentralNotice) or gathered a representative sample from a given country (as is the case with most of the academic ones listed below). Specifically, I'm thinking:
- https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/02/20/pakistani-readers-survey/
- https://academic.oup.com/joc/article-abstract/68/1/143/4915319
- https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2617021
- https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2007/04/24/wikipedia-users/
- https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2011/01/13/wikipedia-past-and-present/
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wikimedia_Reader_Survey_November_2015.pdf
- https://wikiworkshop.org/2016/papers/wikiworkshop_icwsm2016_protonotarios.pdf