Jump to content

Explore Nigeria/Results

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki

Explore Nigeria ran from 15 December 2021 to 31 January 2021l2. It was organized by Free Knowledge Africa.

Top Participants (Writing Contest)

[edit]
  1. Lordgentual - 479.915
  2. B.Korlah - 413.411
  3. Atibrarian - 406.855
  4. OTim75 - 361.795
  5. Paulboht - 283.051
  6. Grace789 - 163.052
  7. Tesleemah - 76.798
  8. Mijesty - 63.877
  9. Semmy1960 - 49.149
  10. Dammy Kaka - 40.555
  11. Ei'eke - 32.062
  12. Em-mustapha - 28.643
  13. Icrochets - 23.4
  14. Edriic - 20.941
  15. Inyor4mr - 15.815
  16. LovelyChizzy - 10.939
  17. Prinz Ayanfe - 10.816
  18. Aderiqueza - 9.11
  19. Fine acer - 9.095
  20. Ridzaina - 8.314
  21. Taoheedah - 7.79
  22. Biowikician - 7.704
  23. Teenyweenyclaire - 5.828
  24. James Rhoda - 5.451
  25. Hopilo12 - 3.107
  26. KachiJames001 - 3.027
  27. JadePhenom - 2.526
  28. Ibjaja055 - 2.055
  29. Mir koks - 1.52
  30. Jibrilsaidu8 - 1.261
  31. Ola2ng - 1.166
  32. Prithee P - 0.559
  33. Ogboinba - 0.058

Top Participants (Photos Contest)

[edit]
  1. ReoMartins - 265
  2. Atibrarian - 143
  3. Prithee P - 92
  4. Em-mustapha - 38
  5. Onyinyeonuoha - 33
  6. Godstime Elijah - 23
  7. Paulboht -7
  8. Jibrilsaidu8 - 2
  9. Ei'eke - 1
  10. Mir koks - 1

Overall Winner

[edit]
  • Atibrarian

Rationale

[edit]

The contest was judged on a number of quantitative rules. However, there is a qualitative rule which states that "the organizers have the final say in the scoring of the contributions, and will clarify the rules and points if needed. Please note that the aim of the contest is to improve Wikipedia and Wikivoyage with high-quality articles, so any content of low quality that has been added will lose points or even result in a ban from the contest if the organizers so decide." The organizers have gone through the articles of the top participants, trying to weigh in on the qualitative aspect. There are quite a few examples where heavy tables with loads of references have been introduced, rather than the actual content, and also copy-pasted content in numerous articles. We believe this to be in violation of the rule above and weighed down these contributions. This means that the final top participants don't correspond with the top contributors on the articles list. Any questions around this can be put to the organizers.