Grants:IEG/Wikimaps Warper 2.0/Renewal

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to: navigation, search


This project is requesting a 6-month renewal of the grant, to continue work in the areas described below.

Scope[edit]

  • Familiarize with relevant usability studies of other GeoHumanities or mapping projects
  • Chart existing and new communities, institutions and individuals for communication
  • Research technological dependencies that affect the tool's behavior: Structured data for Commons, Wikidata, Maps for Wikimedia etc.
  • Carry out user research and collaboration in several settings
    • Questionnaires and/or interviews of current users of the MapWarper software
      • Chart existing workflows
      • Collect observations about the functionality: problems and proposals
    • Questionnaires and polls for a broader group of interested participants though the social media channels
      • Gather use case scenarios
      • Gather case studies, if available
      • Get feedback about the current tool
      • Get feedback about the proposed interfaces
      • Create polls to prioritize features
      • Vote for options in the design
    • Co-design with dedicated participants, online
    • A public online workshop explaining the design issues and gathering feedback
  • Create mockups
    • Wikimaps workflow
    • Examples of other maps workflow interfaces
  • Create a preliminary css style guide
  • Gather a preliminary team for the production
  • Document the study

Budget[edit]

Project worker / designer grant, 4000 € per 3 months

Rationale[edit]

Having an easy-to-use warping tool is an essential part in the workflow of using old maps in Wikimedia projects as well as gathering information from old maps. This project will prepare the user interface of the user facing tools for production.

The historical maps and geographical data workflow has many possible directions where it can evolve, and a functional tool will boost working with them. We are ourselves looking into historical place names in another project in Wikidata: The WikiProject Historical Place, and into connecting historical photographs into the same workflow as the maps. A new upload tool, GLAMpipe, by Wikimedia Finland also supports working with maps metadata.

The Wikimaps project has an established community with several vibrant channels: Commons project page, blog, Facebook group, a newsletter and a mailing list.

Experts and Wikimedia volunteers are invited to act as co-designers, features will be negotiated with them, and logged publicly. The expert/dedicated design group will be sought among current users, GLAM partners working with historical maps, Wikimedia volunteers, Digital Humanities practitioners, OSM volunteers or other mappers and others. There will be an open call, and the possible participants will also be contacted directly.

Measures of success[edit]

Raised awareness of the tool[edit]

  • Targeting a list of 10 institutions worldwide for awareness
  • Targeting at least 3 new Wikimedia communities
  • Keeping the GLAM community updated by engaging all known GLAM coordinators in meetings and communication

Participation or commentary[edit]

Number of individuals / organizations in the design process

  • In the co-design team: 1 per community, at least 6 people
    • The existing Wikimaps developer community
    • Wikimedia volunteers
    • Wikimedia Foundation engineering, GLAM, Maps, design.
    • OpenStreetMap community
    • Major GLAM organizations
    • At least one new partner from a new domain (eg humanitarian)
    • Digital Humanities / academic
  • Feedback from broader communities: At least 30 people commenting

Production plan[edit]

  • Positive feedback for key indicators (such as ease of use, applicability, design)

Documents[edit]

  • Documented input/feedback
    • Statistics from polls and questionnaires
    • Documented comments
  • Video from the online sessions
  • Design documents
  • Code repository
  • Social media statistics
  • Catalogue of use cases collected from the participants throughout this and earlier project phases
  • Possible emerging learning patterns

Community discussion[edit]

Notification[edit]

Endorsements:[edit]

Do you think this project should be continued for another 6 months? Please add your name and comments here. Other feedback, questions or concerns from community members are also highly valued, but please post them on the talk page of this proposal.