Learning and Evaluation/Archive/Team/Evaluation Types
 | This page is kept for historical interest. Any policies mentioned may be obsolete. See current evaluation methodologies in the Evaluation portal. |
Types of Evaluation
[edit]Each of the five purposes of the team is tied to a very specific form of measuring. In addition, at the highest level there is a need to articulate a coherent evaluation strategy for management assessment, which involves an overlap of almost all the initiatives. These are not all to be done by the Grantmaking L&E team (e.g., the "Program Evaluation" section is the responsibility of the "program evaluation" team), but they will all be taken into account in the evaluation and learnings efforts of Grantmaking.
| Type of information | Associated purpose | Audience | Existing Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Management Assessment Overview of the entire program portfolio |
All goals |
|
|
| 2. Grantmaking Scope and Decision making Basic decisions to monitor trends and assess specific grants scope future funding opportunities / partnership |
Informing our grant-making (both current and future strategies) |
|
|
| 3. Process performance How well we do our grantmaking |
Assessing grant-making effectiveness |
|
|
| 4. Organizational effectiveness How effective are grantee partners in their decision-making and program impact? |
Monitoring the effectiveness of our grants and portfolios | GM team, Board, chapters and other partner organizations | Management-level dashboard; Impact Reports; Set of benchmarking tools for projects/countries |
| 5. Program effectiveness Which programs throughout the movement are generating the highest levels of impact per inputs? |
Monitoring the effectiveness of our grants and portfolios |
|
|
| 6. Learnings across movement activities and programs Case studies and lessons learned throughout the movement |
Sharing relevant experiences and lessons within the team and community | All movement affiliates | Case studies; Blog posts; events |