Meta:Requests for adminship/.anaconda

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.

.anaconda[edit]

Confirmation

I'm a contributor of the Italian Wikipedia since June, administrator of that project from September. On Meta, I add some requests for the spam blacklist and, in particular in the last days, I revert vandalisms - so, I would like to be a sysop to fight vandalism and do some maintenance tasks (including the BL). From time to time I'm available on IRC. M7 proposed me to apply for adminship... so, I'm here. Thanks. --.anaconda 12:50, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Good and reliable sysop on the Italian Wikipedia, I trust him. --M/ 13:40, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support - and I assure he is a active part of meta maintainer community. ... thanks, M7 for your persistent encourgement! --Aphaia 13:43, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support A very good admin in the italian Wikipedia, I hope that .anaconda will be soon also a meta-wiki admin! :) Filnik 13:57, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Valepert 14:40, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Iardo 14:41, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pietrodn · talk with me 17:34, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Olando 18:23, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
jes of course --User:Dario vet/Sign 18:25, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
Support --Tooby 18:40, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Helios89 19:34, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Marbot 21:52, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Leoman3000 22:50, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support I have observed this sysop on the Italian Wikipedia from the distance for some time, and have never seen any cause for questioning him. A wonderful admin who I have reason to believe will be just as good as a meta-wiki admin. -- 82.60.67.211 00:23, 19 December 2006 (UTC) Please confirm your vote after logging in. --M/ 09:58, 19 December 2006 (UTC) I'm sorry -- Trixt 22:37, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Nick1915 00:39, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

comment That IP can vote? --Slade ♠ 02:58, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Of course not. --Tooby 13:04, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Paginazero - Ø 09:46, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kal-El ^{drop me a line!} 12:15, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Giovanni 13:19, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fabexplosive 14:29, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Giac! - (Tiago is here) 09:41, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiado 13:28, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ettorre 18:38, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support No question about it! -- Thunderhead 03:39, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Andrea.gf 10:32, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jon Harald Søby 12:43, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per supports from people I trust. ++Lar: t/c 13:32, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Reliable on it.wiki, no reason he shouldn't do a good job on meta --Cruccone 14:54, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Sannita 17:54, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- can't see a reason why not. Redux 11:36, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vote closed. Consensus reached, sysop flag granted.: --M/ 14:01, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]