Meta:Requests for adminship/Eagle 101

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.

Eagle 101[edit]

I would like to nominate Eagle 101 for adminship. He is an admin on the English Wikipedia, and has about 150 edits on Meta. Although he only became active here recently, I feel it would be useful for him to have the sysop bit. Eagle is active in fighting spam on various Wikipedias, including smaller wikis that receive less attention. As such, he is often in need of a meta administrator to add entries to the spam blacklist. Unfortunately, they tend to be in short supply. :) Being an administrator would allow him to do this himself, and, more importantly, give us someone who can help out with the maintenance of the page.--Shanel 20:48, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I accept. Eagle 101 20:53, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support, as nominator.--Shanel 20:48, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cbrown1023 20:52, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
ZOMG Support needs teh tools to fight spam. Misza13 20:56, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fantastic spam-fighter, the blacklist awaits you! ;) --Majorly 20:59, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
support 'can we trust him?' well 'yes we can!'--Doc glasgow 21:02, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Eagle definitely needs this. I don't want to see Eagle saying "!Meta-admin" anymore on IRC. Nishkid64 21:04, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Obvious Support ++Lar: t/c 21:16, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Obviously. Heligoland 21:20, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Az1568 21:29, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jon Harald Søby 21:32, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Steel ^en:Steel 22:36, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Slade ♠ 22:51, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Aphaia 04:44, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Absolutely, he'd be excellent. JoeSmack 05:06, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I‘m Support.--Afinogenoff 08:48, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --.anaconda 14:53, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --M/ 17:55, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- does good work to help keep cross-project spam in check. Redux 18:10, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support, he'll stop bugging me to edit the spam blacklist! ;) guillom 20:33, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Bertrand GRONDIN – ^Talk 22:10, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thogo (talk) 00:11, 5 February 2007 (UTC) I don't know him, but I trust many of the supporters and the proposer.[reply]
Support Needs it. Can be trusted. So why not? ✎ Peter M Dodge ( Talk to Me ) 01:00, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sarah Ewart 02:00, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support NoSeptember 06:18, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support no reason not to support you.--Alnokta 08:34, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Coredesat (en.wp) 15:26, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Jusjih 15:40, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support So he'll stop bugging everyone else to change the spam page! Bastique 18:33, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Marbot 19:09, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support FrancoGG ^{( talk )} 22:55, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support as a highly qualified admin on En who can use the tools here to assist in his multi-project-wide contributions to the fight against spam and related problems. Newyorkbrad 04:22, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support - just hope he gets the regex right this time :p GeorgeMoney 07:51, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support - a stalwart spam-fighter; strong support --A. B. ^(talk) 20:06, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --FloNight 23:41, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral: I would like to support, but I'm just a little hesitant about the lack of consistent contributions yet. Excluding 10 edits in December, you only started editing on January 24, less than two weeks ago and only a week and a half before the nomination. Granted, it's not that much less time than any of the other candidates, but I still think it's a bit too early. However, it doesn't look like this neutral vote will be the deciding factor, so I thank you for your understanding of this vote. Keep up the good work! Flcelloguy (A note?) 00:54, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Grand master ka 04:53, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
+1 --dario vet (talk) 06:59, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent trustworthy guy --AndrewCates 19:39, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
La gazzetta dello Support--Vito Genovese 21:50, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(35/0/3) Sysop flag granted by Datrio: [1] - 19:02, 10 February 2007 Datrio (Talk | contribs | block) changed group membership for User:Eagle 101 from (none) to sysop