Meta:Requests for adminship/Ochilov 2

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.

Ochilov (2)[edit]

Hi! I am requesting Meta adminship to do maintenance tasks here and answer requests. My previous request was withdrawn a year ago, now I think I have enough experience and skills :) --Ochilov (talk) 17:27, 16 December 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • Support Support. Carpodacus (talk) 17:39, 16 December 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support. Farsizabon (talk) 18:09, 16 December 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support. Kotika (talk) 18:11, 16 December 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • support A longer laudatio would be nice though. —DerHexer (Talk) 18:10, 16 December 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support Just don't stop contributing to the ru,eo projects, or I'm going to have a little conversation with you!! :P .--Grind24 (talk) 19:15, 16 December 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Oppose Oppose, no need for the tools. I see five deleted edits (just two speedy deletion request (a sub-page and an empty category) four months ago) and just two reverts (1 (which is a mistake) and another where he removed a message left by an IP to Ochilov's userpage). I think a user must start doing maintenance before becoming an admin and not after he became one. Matiia (talk) 19:39, 16 December 2015 (UTC)cReply[reply]
  • Support Support--Satdeep Gill (talk) 02:17, 17 December 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Oppose Oppose Sorry, but I have to agree with Matiia on this one. Get a little more experience first, and when you come back, I'll be more than happy to support you. :) eurodyne (talk) 03:02, 17 December 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Oppose Oppose Per Matiia and eurodyne. Sorry, --Infinite0694 (Talk) 07:47, 17 December 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Request withdrawn I see my work is not valued enough. Okay... --Ochilov (talk) 09:27, 17 December 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Withdrawn by user.--Syum90 (talk) 11:52, 17 December 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]