Meta talk:Requests for oversight/Xaosflux
Duration[edit]
@Cohaf: the general policy on this is in Meta:Oversighters, it is listed as "proposed" but has been unchallenged for many years. — xaosflux Talk 03:59, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Xaosflux: I read
The vote will run for at least one full week
Then the revi RfOS date is off? Both of you nom on the same date but the end date differs. We have to sort this out soon. Thanks.--Cohaf (talk) 04:01, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
- I'm in no rush :D But we can let User:MarcoAurelio sort it out, getting 25 supporters may take some time if the vote isn't heavily attended, so the closing 'crat may let it run as well. — xaosflux Talk 04:04, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
- Noted, will let Marco decide on what to do but I'm sure the vote will pass without needing extensions, but let's not jinx it. =P.--Cohaf (talk) 04:06, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
- I'm in no rush :D But we can let User:MarcoAurelio sort it out, getting 25 supporters may take some time if the vote isn't heavily attended, so the closing 'crat may let it run as well. — xaosflux Talk 04:04, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
As stated at Meta:Requests for adminship:
Requests should be listed here for at least seven days; bureaucrats should only close after this minimum time. Discussions are not closed early. Adminship will be granted by a support ratio of at least 75%. If a request hasn't been addressed by a bureaucrat after a lengthy period of time, please leave a note at Requests for help from a sysop or bureaucrat. Requests may be extended, or put on hold by bureaucrats, pending decision or finding of consensus.
(bold is mine) Therefore the duration of this request is one week. If after a week a request is succeeding but has not achieved yet the votes, a bureaucrat may extend the discussion at their discrection as has been often done in RfOS and RfCUs at this wiki. Also, please remove the S/O/N headings, it's just unhelpful markdown that pollute Meta:Requests for adminship display. Thank you, —MarcoAurelio (talk) 11:33, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
- @MarcoAurelio:.Noted with thanks, will do all the necessary reverts. Thanks for explanation. I will also change the -revi OS date to end at 7 days. Regards,--Cohaf (talk) 13:18, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
- Sorry that you had already made the changes, I came here first before looking there. Apologies for the trouble caused. Will ask before changing next time.--Cohaf (talk) 13:21, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
- No problems. I just thought it'd be easier to do it myself while I was at it. Best regards, —MarcoAurelio (talk) 17:09, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for understanding.--Cohaf (talk) 17:19, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
- No problems. I just thought it'd be easier to do it myself while I was at it. Best regards, —MarcoAurelio (talk) 17:09, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
- Sorry that you had already made the changes, I came here first before looking there. Apologies for the trouble caused. Will ask before changing next time.--Cohaf (talk) 13:21, 20 January 2019 (UTC)