Punjabi Wikimedians/Wikimedia Conference 2016/Nominations

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki

Official Delegate for Wikimedia Conference[edit]

Wikimedia Conference 2016 is taking place at Berlin, Germany on 22-24 April 2016. As Punjabi Wikimedians we can send one delegate and WMF will take care of the expenses. We have to keep some things in mind before selecting the candidate.We are seeking delegates who will be actively engaged before, during and after the conference and can represent their affiliates. Ideal delegates are those who are

  • involved in the decision making processes of the organization,
  • or evaluation specialists,
  • or program leaders.

We want to decide one individual by 31 December 2015 3 January 2016. The person nominated should give his acceptance of the nomination.

You can nominate more than one person but try not to nominate yourself. You can Support ({{tick}}), Oppose ({{cross}}) or Comment as well. Please sign(~~~~) as well.--Satdeep Gill (talk) 04:37, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just to remind everyone this is not just about the votes. It is more about choosing the delegate keeping the above mentioned 3 points in mind. We might have to might again after delegates update all the information.

Satdeep Gill[edit]

Support[edit]

  1. Y --Stalinjeet (talk) 00:08, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Y--Harvinder Chandigarh (talk) 15:16, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose[edit]

Comments[edit]

  1. This is the first time we have an opportunity to send a delegate by community discussion. I think we should select someone else but also we have to make sure we choose the delegate while keeping the three important points for choosing ideal delegates in mind. --Satdeep Gill (talk) 12:31, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. He is one of the most dedicated member of the community having multilingual skill and good leadership qualities. He has made adequate and appreciable contribution for advancement of the Punjabi Wikipedia and other related projects.If present opportunity is provided to him it may yields even more better results and benefit the community as a whole. --Harvinder Chandigarh (talk) 15:16, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Acceptance[edit]

Param Munde[edit]

Support[edit]

  1. Y Hardwork in Physics Department. --Nirmal Brar Faridkot (talk) 22:00, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose[edit]

Comments[edit]

Acceptance[edit]

Y--Param munde (talk) 18:46, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Parveer Garewal[edit]

Support[edit]

  1. Y Gaurav Jhammat (talk) 14:11, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Y Satdeep Gill (talk) 12:28, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose[edit]

Comments[edit]

  1. I believe he can help us in building a stronger organization with his legal skills.--Satdeep Gill (talk) 12:28, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Acceptance[edit]

Babanwalia[edit]

Support[edit]

  1. Y Satdeep Gill (talk) 03:04, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Y Harvinder Chandigarh (talk) 03:51, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Y Radiomiles (talk) 10:10, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Y --Guglani (talk) 12:14, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Y --ਪ੍ਰਚਾਰਕ (talk) 13:03, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose[edit]

Comments[edit]

  1. He has been contributing to Punjabi Wikimedia projects for a long time now.--Satdeep Gill (talk) 03:04, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. He is one of the pioneer Admin member of the community and has sound technical knowledge required for various futuristic Projects.Y--Harvinder Chandigarh (talk) 04:30, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Experienced Wikipedian with extensive contributions, good insights, zeal to work for the betterment of the project and worthy liaison skills shown as an administrator. --Radiomiles (talk) 10:10, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  4. With proven outstanding track record of contributions including excellent articles(name space edits), He possesses very good interpersonal and leadership skills,professional knowledge of adaptation of wiki software to pawiki needs and profound command at punjabi language and culture.He shall prove to be ideal choice .--Guglani (talk) 12:14, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Acceptance[edit]