Requests for new languages/Wikipedia Modern Etruscan

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Etruscan Wikipedia[edit]

main page Requests for new languages (Wikipedia Modern Etruscan)
submitted verification final decision
Process-stop.svg This proposal has been rejected.
This decision was taken by the language committee in accordance with the Language proposal policy based on the discussion on this page.

The closing committee member provided the following comment:

among other things, it does not indicate an ISO-639-3 code
Proposal summary
  • Language details:
  • Editing community: {{{community}}}
    List your user name if you're interested in editing the wiki. Add "N" next to your
    name if you are a native speaker of this language.
  • Relevant pages:
  • External links:
Please read the handbook for requesters for help using this template correctly.

Linguo Rasna is the only living language and most intriguing tongue of the Tyrrhenian family that gave birth to Latin. I believe the Rasnae puellum et puerrii have a chance to read their sacred language. Modern Etruscan differs from Old Etruscan in that it has a full, learnable vocabulary and syntax. Example: The man drank wine.= Thu puer vinium viniôs. I believe that the remaning Rasnae, exiled from our homeland in Italia to the Nieu Arta ex Americae, a language solely based on the old language, Latin, and Germanic think that our holy tongue shall not be forgotten. Gratium mi azuroii!

Arguments in favour[edit]

Arguments against[edit]

  • w:Etruscan is not only dead, it's gone; most of the language is unknown, and no long texts exist.--Prosfilaes 23:52, 14 September 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • It's a joke. There is no a Modern Etruscan language and the Old one is a dead and lost language. Code ett is for Etruscan. Lin linao 21:01, 20 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Latin belongs to Italic, not Tyrrhenian family. It's Indo-European unlike ancient Etruscan.--Certh 14:51, 9 August 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Language is dead and mostly undeciphered. It's a well known fact. амдф 16:56, 1 September 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • If the proposer has a personal conlang, let him propose it as such. I'm really not sure what he's trying to say right now... AnonMoos

Other discussion[edit]