Requests for new languages/Wikipedia West Palesian

West Palesian Wikipedia[edit]

submitted	verification	final decision

	This proposal has been closed as part of a reform of the request process. This request has not necessarily been rejected, and new requests are welcome. This decision was taken by the language committee in accordance with the Language proposal policy. The closing committee member provided the following comment: This discussion was created before the implementation of the Language proposal policy, and it is incompatible with the policy. Please open a new proposal in the format this page has been converted to (see the instructions). Do not copy discussion wholesale, although you are free to link to it or summarise it (feel free to copy your own comments over). —{admin} Pathoschild 22:02:54, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Proposal summary
Language details: West Palesian (Заходнё-полесская мова or Zachodnio-polesskaja mova, zpo [invented]) Editing community: Zlobny (P), trasianka editor List your user name if you're interested in editing the wiki. Add "N" next to your name if you are a native speaker of this language. Relevant pages: — External links: in Belarusian and Polish Luft A. Das Westpolessische: Sprachliche Besonderheiten und Abgrenzung vom Weіssrussischen und Ukrainischen. Diplomarbeit Universitat Munchen, 1997 Dulicenko A.D. The West Polesian Litetary Language// Language, Minority, Migration: Yearbook 1994/ 1995 from the Centre for Multiethnic Research. Uppsala, 1995 Poljakov O. Das Westpolesische// Slavistica Vilnensis 1998 [Kalbotyra 47(2)]. Vilnius, 1998 Kuraszkiewicz W. Ruthenica. Warszawa, 1985
Please read the handbook for requesters for help using this template correctly.

Number of speakers: 2-3 million
Locations spoken: Brest region of Belarus, South-West of Belarus; North-West of Ukraine.
What about wikipedia in westpalesian language, which is mostly spoken in the Brest region of Belarus (en:polesie)? --Zlobny 15:17, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose: the usual reason -- please, try to find some native speakers ready to contribute, then you'll get support. By the time it might be a good choice to contribute to the Belorussian/Belarusan and other wikipedias. - Slavik IVANOV 17:17, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose: without the number of speakers ~~and probes in Internet of the relevancy of this language,~~ I vote oppose. --Taichi - (あ！) 08:13, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose:lack of native speakers who want the West-palesian WikipediaGdarin | talk 12:35, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion have just begun. trasianka editor 20:35, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Strongly support. THEMOOMIN
If you can read German: [here's] a little more info on West-Palesian. Arbeo 19:03, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
@Zlobny: Is this language used in writing? -- Raetius 11:27, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is. trasianka editor 20:37, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Supportnl:Boudewijn Idema 19:11 1 March (UTC)
Support trasianka editor 01:16, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - for what? Who should write there? Kenwilliams 20:18, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Me, for example. And others from Brest, Kobrin, Pinsk and other places. trasianka editor 20:34, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Weak oppose as I said in Trasianka proposal... First develope be-wiki for some quite good quality level than you may think about my support for sub-projects :) And thanks for this ;) D_T_G 19:04, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, we are not talking about the sub-project, but deffinitly the real project. We are not 'staying in the queue after belarusian', but besides. trasianka editor 20:34, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe you're right I always considered dialect wikipedias as a sub-project, very closely related to sup-projcts. However I continue my opposition until I will know if there are a native speaker willing to contribute and if the writting/spelling is clear for them. D_T_G 11:43, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose --MaximLitvin 09:10, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please, explain your position. trasianka editor 20:34, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Definately Support. --Czalex 20:01, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose. I doubt in enough number of contributors. --EugeneZelenko 14:06, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support. I'd love to see this become a success, but the number of editors is indeed a worrying thing. --IJzeren Jan 14:10, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
OPPOSE. I'm dealing with the Belarusian language for many years as an amateur linguist, and I can attest that there's virtually no written texts in "West-Polessian". They are non-existent. And throughout all these years I have never met a single person who can write in "West-Polessian". It's a spoken transitional dialect between Ukraine and Belarus, or some linguists consider it a separate language (a local microlanguage), but there's virtually nothing in written form. I wonder if the proposer could show us his own writings in this "West-Polessian" language and show us Web pages in "West-Polessian" (can you provide at least 10 links to Web sites that are actually written in that language? Thank you). --Br23net 14:31, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose --Dezidor 07:42, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

support if even a linguist will attest to its existance, even if he thinks it doesnt have a written form, but by all means lets alfabetize it and stop its illiteracy i mean cherokee had no written form before sequoyah made one up by analogy with english from the colonizers and i highly doubt anyone here will claim that cherokee isnt a language, what if it had no written form today? would you deny it, i think not and the same thing goes for this langauge even if the 10 pages dont exist lets make a home page and nine articles for it in its own wikipedia i say !!! Qrc2006