Patlisiso Wikimedia France Research Award lipampiri tse khethiloeng Ho theha ho senya le ho khutlisetsa ho Wikipedia.

Ho theha ho senya le ho khutlisetsa boleng ho Wikipedia

Creating destroying and restoring value in Wikipedia is a groundbreaking classic paper published at the ACM Conference on Supporting Group Work (GROUP) in 2007.

Sheba mongolo o felletseng mona.

Kakaretso

Pampiri ena e fana ka mokhoa oa ho lekanya phello ea tokiso Bangoli ba ts eletseng (Reid Priedhorsky Jilin Chen Shyong (Tony) K Lam Katherine Panciera Loren Terveen le John Riedl) ba ile ba sebetsa lefapheng la lipatlisiso la GroupLens Univesithing ea Minnesota.

Ba fana ka maikutlo a ho lekanya phello ea tokiso e fanoeng ka makhetlo ao mofuta o hlophisitsoeng o shebiloeng ka ona Khopolo ea "persistent word view (PWV) e thehiloe mohopolong oa pono ea sengoloa nako le nako ha sengoloa se shejoa lentsoe le leng le le leng la lona le shejoa. Ha lentsoe le ngotsoeng ke mohlophisi X le shejoa o nkoa e le PWV e le ngoe.

Ba sebelisa letoto la li-dataset tse nkang lilemo tse nè ho hlahloba bahlophisi ba limilione tse 4.2 le liphetoho tse limilione tse 58 me liphello li totobatsa bohlokoa ba bahlophisi ba khafetsa ba laolang seo batho ba se bonang ha ba etela Wikipedia me ba bontša hore puso ena e ntse e eketseha Ka mohlala 10% e ka holimo limo ea bahlophisi ka palo ea liphetoho e kentse karolo ea 86% ea PWV me ba ka holimo ho 0.1% ba kentse 44%.

Ba kenya ts ebetsong mokhoa oa ho lemoha tšenyo ba sebelisa feela maikutlo a amanang le ho khutlisa Metric e kengoa ts ebetsong ka protocol e tsoetseng pele ea boithuto ba batho e nang le liphetho tse bonts ang ho potlaka ha ts enyehelo (42% ea liketsahalo tse senyehileng li lokisoa hang-hang me 0.75% ea liketsahalo li tsoela pele ho feta maikutlo a 1000). Hoa thahasellisa hore ha ba nahane feela hore na lihlooho li ile tsa lula nako e kae li le boemong bo senyehileng empa hape le hore na li ne li talingoa ka makhetlo a makae ha li ntse li le sebakeng sena Le ha ts رenyehelo e akaretsang ea ts enyo ho Wikipedia e le tlase li bontsa hore e ntse e phahama Ponahalo ea bots ea ho lokisa tšenyo mathoasong a 2006 e bonahala e emisitse kholo e kholo.

Ho ipapisitsoe le lipampiri tse fetileng joalo ka 2004 Ho ithuta tšebelisano moho le likhohlano lipakeng tsa bangoli ba nang le lipono tsa phallo ea nalane (hape ke mokhethoa bakeng sa moputso ona) ba sebelisa likarolo tsa hae tsa lits enyehelo ho lingoliloeng (tse se nang kelello tse khopisang tse fosahetseng) empa hape li nepahetse ebile eketsa tse ling tsa tsona (Litaba tse fosahetseng ho hlakola ka mokhoa o sa fellang Spam) Ka ho sebelisa kahlolo ea batho ba bonts a haholo hore ts enyehelo ke ea sehlopha sa bohlanya.

Maikutlo a Jury

menahano ea semina mokhoa oa ho bala litaba tse ngata

Vote for this paper

Vote

1. Very useful measure of edit impact. Avenue (talk) 00:12, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
2. Interesting work --PierreSelim (talk) 13:29, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
3. Ypnypn (talk) 13:55, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
4. Most definitely; the D_LOOSE and D_STRICT regular expressions alone would win this a prize. Ironholds (talk) 21:22, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
5. Introduces several broadly relevant new metrics for assessing edit impact & article quality; shows the importance of Wikipedia's core editor base in creating and maintaining the value of the encyclopedia, refuting the commonsense notion that Wikipedia is somehow a product of a nameless, faceless "crowd". And exposes both the ways in which Wikipedia and open wikis in general are vulnerable to quality degradation, and the robust mechanisms that exist to combat it. Best of the five! Disclosure: I have co-authored a research paper with the last author. Jtmorgan (talk) 21:27, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
6. Tbayer (WMF) (talk) 22:31, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
7. "Persistent word view" is a interesting idea. Finn Årup Nielsen (fnielsen) (talk) 13:57, 11 March 2013 (UTC)