Talk:Pageviews Analysis/Archives/2016/2

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Difference between 2 statistics

Hello,

I think there is a problem in your consultation statistics since yesterday : for the article "Jean-Louis Martinoty", there is no number for 06.27.2016 in the 10 last days statistic and 52 for the same day in the 90 last days statistic. What is the good number ? Thank you very much.

Joisy78

Sorry, I did not read the beginning of Editing Talk.

My web browser is Mozilla Firefox and I use Windows 8.1.

Joisy 78 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Joisy78 (talk) 12:00, 28 June 2016‎(UTC)

Hello Joisy 78! Sometimes data for today or yesterday is not yet available, in which case it is left blank. Here it seems certain API endpoints have the data, and others do not, which I think is a result of caching. What I can reassure you is that any actual numbers you see are correct. So if you see 52, there were 52 views for that day, even though it didn't show up in the view for the last 10 days. If you check back tomorrow you should see 52 with any date range you choose. Hope this helps MusikAnimal (WMF) (talk) 15:45, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

JOSM

When trying to go here:

https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews?pages=JOSM&project=en.wikipedia.org

I'm redirected here with this error message:

URL: [1]
Error message: Operation timed out
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kocio (talk) 30 June 2016‎(UTC)

Hmm, it works for me. Maybe refresh and try it again? It might have been a temporary glitch. -- DannyH (WMF) (talk) 22:15, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
With a recent release I added a lot of special error handling. If it was a critical error it should have showed it. The "operation timed out" was just a safeguard because sometimes people saw an infinite spinny (the loading indicator) and were scratching their heads. I'm going to guess this was a fluke and genuinely took longer than 10 seconds the first time around (subsequent requests would be cached and respond very quickly), so I'll start with increasing the timeout to 20 seconds. Thanks for the report! MusikAnimal (WMF) (talk) 22:30, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
Sorry, I guess I should make sure it's still working for you :) @Kocio: Can you confirm? MusikAnimal (WMF) (talk) 22:32, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
Looks like it wasn't your fault at all - Privacy Badger was overzealaous and blocked en.wikipedia.org site completely! It might be an issue worth pointing them out, but thanks for your attention, anyway. - kocio 22:47, 30 June 2016 (UTC)