Jump to content

Template:IEG/Committee/Review/Score/2

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki

Proposal review: scores, comments and feedback

[edit]

This template is used to post aggregated feedback from the committee to a proposal's talk page.


==Aggregated feedback from the committee for ''(project name)''==
{{IEG/Committee/Review/Score/2
| A score=
| B score=
| C score=
| D score=
| comments=
}}
__TOC__


Scoring criteria (see the rubric for background) Score
1=weak alignment 10=strong alignment
(A) Impact potential
  • Does it fit with Wikimedia's strategic priorities?
  • Does it have potential for online impact?
  • Can it be sustained, scaled, or adapted elsewhere after the grant ends?
(B) Innovation and learning
  • Does it take an Innovative approach to solving a key problem?
  • Is the potential impact greater than the risks?
  • Can we measure success?
(C) Ability to execute
  • Can the scope be accomplished in 6 months?
  • How realistic/efficient is the budget?
  • Do the participants have the necessary skills/experience?
(D) Community engagement
  • Does it have a specific target community and plan to engage it often?
  • Does it have community support?
  • Does it support diversity?
Comments from the committee:

This area will be comments from the committee.