User:Pols12/T303668/Wikipedia:Test Wikipedia/bn

(বাংলা) এটি একটি প্রবন্ধ। এতে কিছু উইকিমিডিয়ানদের মতামত ও ধারণা প্রকাশ পেতে পারে তবে ব্যাপকভাবে সমর্থিত নাও হতে পারে। এটি মেটা সংক্রান্ত নীতিমালা নয়, তবে এটি অন্যান্য উইকিমিডিয়া প্রকল্পের নীতিমালা বা নির্দেশিকা হতে পারে। প্রয়োজনে নির্দ্বিধায় এই পাতাটি হালনাগাদ করুন, অথবা বৃহৎ পরিবর্তনের প্রস্তাব থাকলে আলোচনার পাতা ব্যবহার করুন৷

টীকা

This essay is about a custom in English wikipedia. See also Meta:Snowball for Meta policy rejecting snowball closes on Meta wiki.

Snowballs

The "snowball clause" is an interpretation of the Ignore all rules policy that stems from the fact that Wikipedia is not a bureaucracy, and the desire that editors exercise common sense. The snowball clause states:

If an issue doesn't even have a snowball's chance in hell of getting an unexpected outcome from a certain process, then there is no need to run it through that process.

The snowball clause is not policy, but it is designed to prevent editors from using policies and guidelines as a filibuster.

For example, if an article is speedily deleted for a reason not explicitly listed in the criteria for speedy deletion but it would almost certainly be deleted via the requests for deletion process anyway, there's little sense in undeleting it.

What the snowball clause is not

Hell. Note the complete absence of snowballs.

An uphill battle is extremely difficult but potentially winnable. In cases of genuine contention in the Meta-Wiki community, it is best to settle the dispute through discussion and debate. This should not be done merely to assuage complaints that process wasn't followed, but to produce a correct outcome, which often requires that the full process be followed. Allowing a process to continue to its conclusion may allow for a more reasoned discourse, ensures that all arguments are fully examined, and maintains a sense of fairness. However, process for its own sake is not part of Wikipedia policy.

Snowball test

এই পরীক্ষাটি সঞ্চালিত হওয়ার পরেই একটি ক্রিয়াতে প্রয়োগ করা যেতে পারে এবং এইভাবে অভিজ্ঞতা থেকে শেখার জন্য এটি একটি কার্যকর উপায়

• If an issue is run through some process and the resulting decision is unanimous, then it might have been a candidate for the snowball clause.
• If an issue is "snowballed", and somebody later raises a reasonable objection, then it probably was not a good candidate for the snowball clause. Nevertheless, if the objection raised is unreasonable or contrary to policy, then the debate needs to be re-focused, and editors may be advised to avoid disrupting wikipedia to make a point.

উদাহরণ

• When discussing community banning of disruptive user, who may have used several sock puppets and had vandalized articles, then if the result is clear from onset, the discussion can be closed as SNOW and ban enacted without waiting for flurry of pile-on support !votes for the sake of process.

আরও দেখুন

• Meta:Snowball
• Ignore all rules
• en:Wikipedia:Snowball clause – the original version of this page, as imported to MediaWiki at 22:16, 30 July 2008, changes to MediaWiki version, changes to English Wikipedia version