User talk:4nn1l2

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Boarisch | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | བོད་ཡིག | bosanski | català | کوردی | corsu | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | ދިވެހިބަސް | Ελληνικά | emiliàn e rumagnòl | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | Nordfriisk | Frysk | galego | Alemannisch | ગુજરાતી | עברית | हिन्दी | Fiji Hindi | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Ido | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | ភាសាខ្មែរ | 한국어 | kar | Kurdî | Limburgs | lietuvių | Baso Minangkabau | македонски | മലയാളം | молдовеняскэ | Bahasa Melayu | မြန်မာဘာသာ | مازِرونی | नेपाली | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | Kapampangan | polski | português | Runa Simi | română | русский | sicilianu | سنڌي | සිංහල | slovenčina | slovenščina | Soomaaliga | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ślůnski | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkmençe | Tagalog | Türkçe | татарча/tatarça | ⵜⴰⵎⴰⵣⵉⵖⵜ  | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 吴语 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/-

Welcome to Meta![edit]

Hello, 4nn1l2. Welcome to the Wikimedia Meta-Wiki! This website is for coordinating and discussing all Wikimedia projects. You may find it useful to read our policy page. If you are interested in doing translations, visit Meta:Babylon. You can also leave a note on Meta:Babel or Wikimedia Forum (please read the instructions at the top of the page before posting there). Happy editing!

-- Meta-Wiki Welcome (talk) 07:23, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

4nn1l2/EditCounterGlobalOptIn.js[edit]

Please create this in the User: namespace instead, i.e. User:4nn1l2/EditCounterGlobalOptIn.js. Sorry for the inconvenience. PiRSquared17 (talk) 17:47, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Re: Schulze method[edit]

Thanks for spotting my mistake. Feel free to strike my statement in the archive and correct it. The WMF election committee never revisited that decision, nor they ever consulted experts. They said they were too busy to check whether the system made sense, and they felt they were expert enough on their own (both arguments are ridiculous, of course). The Schulze method is still the most appreciated one, as it was originally chosen with quite wide agreement and reasoning; make sure to choose the correct variant, though. Alternatively, the French Wikipedia poll system uses w:Condorcet method, which is often considered easier to understand: you might consider it as alternative. Nemo 21:05, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Yes, of course Condorcet has its issues. They use it only for polls, which can only have one outcome oout of several options, if I remember correctly. Should be explained at w:fr:Aide:Prise de décision, no time to check now. Nemo 21:25, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
Note that for multiple winners there is w:Schulze STV, as Schulze in person wrote us at some point.[1] Nemo 10:10, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Mentor for GSoC Project : Reading List[edit]

Hello! I am a second-year computer science student from India. I hope to work upon the project Reading List as a part of GSoC-2016[0]. I am being guided by Joaquin Oltra Hernandez and I have started gathering information on how the reading List looks like. As the project lacks one more mentor for getting selected for "Featured for GSoC" we require a community member who could shepered this process and as you are the one who proposed this idea, it would be great if you could co-mentor me.
Thanks! --Harithaharikumar

Plagiarism detection[edit]

Hi! You voted for improving plagiarism detection as an important suggestions in the community wishlist survey last year. I'm pinging people who showed interest in that task to tell them we have some suggestions for how things could look, if you'd like to glance at them and give us some feedback. They're available here: phab:T120435#2266283. It's easiest if comments are left in Phabricator, since that's where much of the development is happening, but they can be left on Meta too, of course. /Johan (WMF) (talk) 17:14, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Cross-wiki watchlist[edit]

Hi! You voted for the cross-wiki watchlist as an important suggestions in the community wishlist survey last year. I'm pinging editors who showed interest in that task to tell them we have some suggestions for how things could look, if you'd like to glance at them and give us some feedback. You can find them on the project page on Meta. If you'd like to share any comments, you're very welcome to do so on the talk page. /Johan (WMF) (talk) 00:48, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

2016 Community Wishlist Survey[edit]

Hi,

You’re getting this message because you participated in the 2015 Community Wishlist Survey and we want to make sure you don't miss it this year – or at least can make the conscious choice to ignore if it you want to. The 2015 survey decided what the Community Tech team should work on during 2016. It was also the focus of Wikimedia hackathons and work by other developers. You can see the status of wishes from the 2015 wishlist at 2015 Community Wishlist Survey/Results.

The 2016 Community Wishlist Survey is now open for wishes. You can create proposals until November 20. You will be able to vote on which wishes you think are best or most important between November 28 and December 12. /Johan (WMF) (talk) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:17, 14 November 2016 (UTC)