User talk:EpochFail/CSCW 2016 report

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki

Thank you for taking the time to write this report. EdSaperia (talk) 20:57, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Case study in "A case for sequential analysis"[edit]

Thanks for the summary, Aaron. I've just downloaded the pre-print from this article and, as far as I can see, it does include a case study illustrating the usefulness of this kind of analysis. So, didn't they presented the case study at CSCW? (--GlimmerPhoenix (talk) 13:37, 10 March 2016 (UTC)).[reply]

Yeah. I specifically asked the question at Brian's talk. I guess I didn't just want to see the method applied, but rather to see it provide some unique insight that would demonstrate the utility of sequence analysis. I don't think the case study provides such a compelling insight and that's what I'd expect from a CSCW paper. --EpochFail (talk) 20:42, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:EpochFail/CSCW_2016_report&oldid=15428746"