User talk:Jcc

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki

Adjusted text[edit]

There has been a request to inform all who voted in the RfC about interlinking accounts involved with paid editing about the following adjustment in the "statement of issue" on Sept 18th, 2017.

It was clarified that this effort will help deal not only with impersonation of specific Wikipedians but also claims of being in good standing made by those who are not.[1] Thanks. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 19:59, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your vote[edit]

I'm coming here, per your suggestion. The big take away from that answer I wrote was that I messed up, that I operated under a misconception that the queue was public. The last two sentences where only meant as a footnote to my answer. I did not mean to deflect by trying to say "Well I wasn't the only one to do it." The last two sentences were meant to say "It's not at all obvious that this information is private, unless you actually try to look at the request from a different account without the renamer flag." Linking to the other user's posting was only meant to validate the point that there should be some notice stating that non-renamers do not have access to these requests. I should probably have made that clearer in my answer to you.—CYBERPOWER (Chat) 14:29, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Cyberpower678: Thanks for your response. I'm not out to get you- in fact, I don't think I've had that many interactions with you on, apart from on Izkala's talk page. This is obviously much more of a big deal to you than it is to me, so I'm happy to add a note back at the votes page; you seem to be sincere in your explanation and I appreciate you coming here and explaining further. Jcc (talk) 18:16, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. I'm glad I was able to clarify my response. I'll be sure to make my answers more clear next time. :-)—CYBERPOWER (Chat) 18:33, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template Wizard script available for testing[edit]

Hello. I'm contacting you because you voted for the Infobox Wizard in the 2017 Community Wishlist Survey.

The Infobox Wizard has gotten an upgrade - it's now a Template Wizard which works for infoboxes and all other templates. The feature is being developed as an extension (which will allow for localization) but there is a prototype user script which works well.

The Wishlist Team would love it if you could take a few minutes to try the Template Wizard prototype script out and give us feedback on whether it lives up to your expectations. This feedback will help build the script into an extension. To get started, add the following to your Special:MyPage/common.js -

mw.loader.load( '' );

The Template Wizard will show up as a puzzle-piece icon in the 2010 WikiEditor. You can click on the icon to insert a template. Your thoughts are needed on whether it makes sense for the wizard to be available for all users by default or if there should be a preference for it. If it's a preference, what should the default be? Please leave your feedback here. Thank you! -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 22:41, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Community Wishlist Survey[edit]


You get this message because you’ve previously participated in the Community Wishlist Survey. I just wanted to let you know that this year’s survey is now open for proposals. You can suggest technical changes until 11 November: Community Wishlist Survey 2019.

You can vote from November 16 to November 30. To keep the number of messages at a reasonable level, I won’t send out a separate reminder to you about that. /Johan (WMF) 11:24, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

SGrabarczuk (WMF)

18:26, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

SGrabarczuk (WMF)

16:08, 11 December 2020 (UTC)