User talk:Kernigh

Welcome to my talk page!

Add a new section (like == Name of section ==) for each thread.
Post your comment here and sign it with ~~~~

For a faster response, post to my Wikibooks talk page, telling me to look here.

Wikiversity[edit]

Kernigh, I've added a section to the No to Wikiversity page you created. It may be too strong; feel free to edit it or remove it as you see fit. However, I think it's necessary to point out that calling oneself a university has implications, and it's not something any Wikimedia project could do lightly. I think the page is very useful; thank you for creating it. Let me know if I can be of any assistance. Chick Bowen 21:10, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I also added my name to the list of authors. Chick Bowen 21:12, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome[edit]

Kernigh, please see my post in the welcome message proposal. -- Slade ^pt.wp 16:23, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

New projects policy[edit]

Kernigh, I have seen on the Proposals for new projetcs page that you often tell people that their project proposal do not belong to that page because they are not "wikis with a new type of content". I have read carefully the Wikimedia's New project policy, and I have not found there that new projects should necessarily be wikis with a new type of content. Maybe you have an older version of that page in mind, or maybe the page does not reflect the actual Wikimedia Foundation policy about new projects. Instead, the New project policy page says "If you want to propose a new project under the umbrella of the Wikimedia Foundation (...)". Now, I do not see why projects like Stand-alone WikiEditor], for example, should not, in principle, be taken under the umbrella of the Wikimedia Foundation. Fredofromstart 04:36, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Inupiaq[edit]

An anonymous user created the legitimate text in ik:Iqsrabutilik within the last little bit, meaning that there is indeed potential users. Does this effect your view of the project? -- Zanimum 14:56, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Errata Wikibook[edit]

Errata (link to prev. vote) is again up for VfD, the rational you used on the last discussion seems to still be valid and one that I share, If you still think the same please state you opinion/vote on the active VfD discussion. --Panic 16:49, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Enwikipediathink[edit]

Just a note that I've nominated this page for deletion. You should be able to find the discussion here, unless I've completely botched things. — Isarra (talk) 08:48, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia genealogy project[edit]

Please visit this page if you wish to contribute to a centralized discussion about a Wikimedia genealogy project. Thank you! --Another Believer (talk) 19:22, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]