User talk:Tomybrz/Archival 1

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
[[Fichier:{{{icone}}}|20px]] User
[[Fichier:{{{icone}}}|20px]] User Talk
[[Fichier:{{{icone}}}|20px]] Don't know
[[Fichier:{{{icone}}}|20px]] Other pages
Welcome to my talk page, if you need to contact me in french, please look here : Discussion/Talk. For other languages, leave a message in this page.

#CVN-SW[edit]

I've granted your voice request. --Cameron11598 (talk) 00:22, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Good Morning, thanks you ☺. Tomybrz Bip Bip 10:01, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

re reverts[edit]

Hi, thanks for helping out at meta but we generally leave such things there and not revert. First of all, an edit request is not vandalism per say. Secondly, there's a request, just empty one. I will suggest more AGF by asking the IP what they are doing as well as leaving them a friendly note and definitely not {{test2}} warning which is overreaching. Regards,--Cohaf (talk) 17:48, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Changed to {{test1}}. Thanks for tips. Tomybrz Bip Bip 17:52, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I left a note on the IP talkpage to see what exactly they are doing. --Cohaf (talk) 17:57, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Heads up, in Chinese, patroller and rollbacker is 巡查员以及回退员, just in case you need it on your userpage. --Cohaf (talk) 10:12, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks you ☺. Tomybrz Bip Bip 10:16, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Welcomed!--Cohaf (talk) 14:09, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

┌─────────────────────────────────┘
Please note that this revert was completely uncalled for. Unless you have reason to revert based on valid concerns, please leave userspace edited by the user in question alone. Please self-revert as necessary. Hiàn (talk)/editing on mobile account 17:25, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies. Please disregard that message; unfortunately I wrongly assumed too much. Hiàn (talk)/editing on mobile account 17:26, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Since I happened to patrol this page, the SMWT indicator is misleading. Meta isn't considered small wiki, neither enwikibooks. I think this is where all the confusion came from. My advice is to just remove the wikilinks altogether or use a plain summary. Cheers. --Cohaf (talk) 17:36, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done sorry for confusion. Regards. Tomybrz Bip Bip 18:33, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks!--Cohaf (talk) 01:41, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

My translation : ici[edit]

Bonjour Tomybrz, venant du même wiki, je me permets de m'adresser à vous dans la même langue, si ça ne vous dérange pas. Vous avez annulé ma traduction, mais ce qui vous choque en français est la traduction de l'anglais. N'avez-vous pas remarqué qu'il s'agissait d'une traduction ? Je trouve que ma traduction est parfaite. Ce qui vous gène, c'est la phrase en anglais d'après votre résumé du revert. Pourriez-vous modifier ce qui ne vous conviens pas dans la page originale (anglaise) pour que je puisse enfin faire cette traduction. Reverter une bonne traduction, alors que c'est la page originale qui est fausse n'est pas très sympa. Pensant que c'est une p'tite bévue, je vous souhaite une bonne soirée . Cordialement. --Eihel (talk) 21:22, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Eihel:, j'ai dit qu'il y avait confusion et que c'était ma faute, voir Special:Diff/18950104. Encore désolé. Tomybrz Bip Bip 21:24, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]