Wiki Research Ideas/Design
Author n°1
Foreword
According to Wikipedia:Verifiability, Verifiability "means that people reading and editing the encyclopedia can check that information comes from a reliable source". So far, it stands as the main answer to trust expectations of Wikipedia readers. This 8th issue gathers several insightful views on a crucial epistemological thema and its numerous impacts on the current social and technic structure of encyclopedic communities (continued→)
Peer-reviewing comittee debates
Tools & Datas
Author n°2
The sociological consequences of verifiability
Author n°3
Proposing a new device to enhance verifiability
For several years, the project Wikisource has used a relevant design to assert its own verifiaibility issues: a pdf of the original text is put aside its wikisource transcription, so that users and readers can easily check the correctness of this transcription. This design could also enhance Wikipedia verifiability. With the growth of open access, we are able to find the original text of a numerous encyclopedic footnotes. Therefore I have created a new script that allows to check quickly and easily if a reference is accurately summarized (continued→)
Author n°4
Formal verifiability and community trust
The current practices of Wikipedia verifiability is mostly formal: the mere fact of presenting complete footnotes enables trust. A recent survey that I lead, shows that users who are well aware of scientific layout are deemed more reliable. In order to complement this facts and figures, I have made a comprehensive analysis of the rare cases where this trust is deceived: the formal presentation turned out to be only formal as the encyclopedic facts were not at all related. (continued→)
Author n°5
From Quellenkritik to Wiki-writing : an historical outlook
The apparent novelty of wiki structures tends to hide the historical depth of its epistemological practices. Most of their features (history, hyperlinks, discussion pages…) extend in some way older needs and devices of printing scientific research… (continued→)
Author n°6
What are reliable sources?
Traditionally, encyclopedy relies mostly (if not solely) on scientific sources. Yet, Wikipedia coverage is wider : it includes notably press articles and databases. Through the past 12 years, this extension of accepted knowledge has trigger numerous debates… (continued→)
Author n°1
Aliquam eget sem eget nibh sagittis lacinia sit amet eu urna. Vivamus sollicitudin diam ut tortor tempor eleifend. Fusce vel justo dui, sollicitudin lacinia est.
Author n°4
Aliquam eget sem eget nibh sagittis lacinia sit amet eu urna. Vivamus sollicitudin diam ut tortor tempor eleifend. Fusce vel justo dui, sollicitudin lacinia est.
Author n°2
Aliquam eget sem eget nibh sagittis lacinia sit amet eu urna. Vivamus sollicitudin diam ut tortor tempor eleifend. Fusce vel justo dui, sollicitudin lacinia est.
Author n°5
Aliquam eget sem eget nibh sagittis lacinia sit amet eu urna. Vivamus sollicitudin diam ut tortor tempor eleifend. Fusce vel justo dui, sollicitudin lacinia est.
Author n°3
Aliquam eget sem eget nibh sagittis lacinia sit amet eu urna. Vivamus sollicitudin diam ut tortor tempor eleifend. Fusce vel justo dui, sollicitudin lacinia est.
Author n°6
Aliquam eget sem eget nibh sagittis lacinia sit amet eu urna. Vivamus sollicitudin diam ut tortor tempor eleifend. Fusce vel justo dui, sollicitudin lacinia est.
- Author n°7
- Author n°8
- Author n°9
- Author n°10
- Author n°11
- Author n°12
- Author n°13
- Author n°14
- Author n°15
- Author n°16
- Author n°17
- Author n°18
- Author n°19
- Author n°20
- Author n°21
- Author n°22
- Author n°23
- Author n°24