Wikimedia Foundation Transparency Report/June 2015/Requests for Content Alteration & Takedown/ar

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
تقرير الشفافية الذي تصدره مؤسسة ويكيميديا
تقرير الشفافية الذي تصدره مؤسسة ويكيميديا

كافة تقارير الشفافية

سياسات مؤسسة ويكيميديا المتعلقة بالخصوصية

The Wikimedia projects make up one of the world's largest repositories of human knowledge. With that much information, someone is bound to get upset by some of the content from time to time. While the vast majority of content disputes are resolved by users themselves, in some extreme cases the Wikimedia Foundation may receive a legal demand to override our users.

The Wikimedia projects are yours, not ours. People just like you from around the world write, upload, edit, and curate all of the content. Therefore, we believe users should decide what belongs on Wikimedia projects whenever legally possible.

Below, you will find more information about the number of requests we receive, where they come from, and how they could impact free knowledge. You can also learn more about how we fight for freedom of speech through our user assistance programs in the FAQ.

Threats to freedom of speech, writing and action, though often trivial in isolation, are cumulative in their effect and, unless checked, lead to a general disrespect for the rights of the citizen.

— George Orwell, Writer،  (1948)
يناير - يونيو 2015
Total Number of Requests
يناير - يونيو 2015
Percentage of Requests Granted


يناير - يونيو 2015
Government requests breakdown
إيطاليا University (Asserting Governmental Rights) ١
بولونيا Politicians, Candidates, & Political Parties ١
سريلانكا مهنة عسكرية ١
سورينام Politicians, Candidates, & Political Parties ١
المملكة المتحدة Crown Prosecution Service ١
الولايات المتحدة Politicians, Candidates, & Political Parties ٢
Federal Agency ١
مجهول Politicians, Candidates, & Political Parties ١
يناير - يونيو 2015
Where did these requests come from?
البلد مستورد
Flag of الولايات المتحدة United States ٨٥
Flag of فرنسا France ٢٣
Flag of ألمانيا Germany ٢٣
Flag of المملكة المتحدة United Kingdom ١٣
Flag of إيطاليا Italy ٦
Flag of روسيا Russia ٦
Flag of اليابان Japan ٥
Flag of جمهورية التشيك Czech Republic ٤
Flag of كوريا Korea ٤
Flag of أستراليا Australia ٣
Flag of كندا Canada ٣
Flag of الهند India ٢
Flag of هولندا Netherlands ٢
Flag of إسبانيا Spain ٢
Flag of النمسا Austria ٢
Flag of البرازيل Brazil ١
Flag of نيوزيلندا New Zealand ١
Flag of تركيا Turkey ١
Flag of صربيا Serbia ١
Flag of بلونيا Poland ١
Flag of سريلانكا Sri Lanka ١
Flag of الصين China ١
Flag of بلجيكا Belgium ١
Flag of السويد Sweden ١
Flag of سلوفينيا Slovenia ١
Flag of النرويج Norway ١
Flag of لاتفيا Latvia ١
Flag of باكستان Pakistan ١
Flag of رومانيا Romania ١
Flag of الدنمارك Denmark ١
Flag of سورينام Suriname ١
Flag of تايوان Taiwan ١
Flag of بيرو Peru ١
مجهول ٣٣
يناير - يونيو 2015
Which Wikimedia projects were targeted?
مشروع مستورد
ويكيبيديا الإنجليزية ١٠٥
ويكيميديا كومنز ٢٣
German Wikipedia ١٩
French Wikipedia ١٦
مشروع بدون إسم ١٦
Not a WMF site ١٠
Japanese Wikipedia ٥
Italian Wikipedia ٤
Multiple ٤
Russian Wikisource ٤
Spanish Wikipedia ٣
Czech Wikipedia ٣
Chinese Wikipedia ٢
Dutch Wikipedia ٢
Russian Wikipedia ٢
Korean Wikipedia ٢
Catalan Wikipedia ٢
Portuguese Wikipedia ١
Polish Wikipedia ١
Slovenian Wikipedia ١
Swedish Wikipedia ١
Arabic Wikipedia ١
English Wikispecies ١
Romanian Wikipedia ١
Somali Wikipedia ١
Danish Wikiquote ١
French Wiktionary ١
English Wiktionary ١


Copyrighting Facts

  • Time Period: May 2015
  • Story: A user contacted us to express concern about an English Wikipedia article on a famous work of art. They wanted to remove a single sentence, on the grounds that the sentence infringed their claimed copyright in a theory they had published some years ago. We explained to them that it is impossible to copyright an idea or a short statement of fact. They could copyright their article, but not the theories contained within. If the community thought the idea was interesting or notable and complied with Wikipedia’s policies, it was free to include it in the article.

Citation Needed

  • Time Period: January 2015
  • Story: A self-identified religious group wrote us, requesting that we remove multiple English Wikipedia articles. As support for their request, they cited a self-publication declaring that the founder of their tradition is the ruler of the universe. We explained that the Wikimedia Foundation does not edit or curate content on Wikipedia, and that if they were concerned about inaccuracies, they could consult Wikipedia's experienced volunteer editors. We also directed them to Wikipedia’s policy on verifiability and guide to identifying reliable sources, so that they could better understand the standards applied to Wikipedia articles and permissible sources to cite in those articles.

Political Points

  • Time Period: March 2015
  • Story: A lawyer reached out to us on behalf of a lesser-known North American political party that was unhappy with edits to English Wikipedia articles about the party and one of its leaders. Her clients apparently wanted previous, more promotional versions of the articles restored in place of the later versions. To better engage in discussions with the community, we encouraged them to familiarize themselves with Wikipedia's recommendations on style and tone and the policy restricting use of promotional language. We also advised that one of the best ways to resolve their concerns is to engage with the community directly.