Purpose of the report[edit]

This form is for organizations receiving Annual Plan Grants to report on their results to date. For progress reports, the time period for this report will the first 6 months of each grant (e.g. 1 January - 30 June of the current year). For impact reports, the time period for this report will be the full 12 months of this grant, including the period already reported on in the progress report (e.g. 1 January - 31 December of the current year). This form includes four sections, addressing global metrics, program stories, financial information, and compliance. Please contact APG/FDC staff if you have questions about this form, or concerns submitting it by the deadline. After submitting the form, organizations will also meet with APG staff to discuss their progress.

Global metrics overview - all programs[edit]

We are trying to understand the overall outcomes of the work being funded across our grantees' programs. Please use the table below to let us know how your programs contributed to the Global Metrics. We understand not all Global Metrics will be relevant for all programs, so feel free to put "0" where necessary. For each program include the following table and

Next to each required metric, list the outcome achieved for all of your programs included in your proposal.
Where necessary, explain the context behind your outcome.
In addition to the Global Metrics as measures of success for your programs, there is another table format in which you may report on any OTHER relevant measures of your programs success

For more information and a sample, see Global Metrics.

Overall[edit]

First number is from proposal 2016–2017 (when we had listed one), second number is from progress report, third number is the number for the impact report.
Please not that #5 only includes New articles. We are not sure how to count Improved articles (in the weekly editing contest and on Wikipedia Education dashboard) without the number being possible inaccurate.

Wikimedia Norge has found it difficult to report on global metrics in the past. This has been quite obvious in our previous proposals and reports where metrics have been lacking. The FDC and the staff assessments have commented on this and been seriously concerned about the lack of metrics to measure impact. We had both trouble collecting user names from events and found it difficult to calculate the metrics with the tools available. Thanks to the Wikipedia Education Dashboard the situation is now different. We hope all readers of our reports from this last year, 2016–2017, will get a better understanding of our work and it's impact.
At times it can be difficult to decide whether or not to include uploads, edits and involved editors and individuals in the global metrics. Uploads done by Glam partners are often done on their own initiativ, which is very good, and WMNO will encourage this in meetings and talks, and try to find ways of getting the volunteers involved in using the data added, but can it be related directly to our programs? Sometimes, sometimes not. The same goes for the weekly editing contest which are most of the time organized solely by editors.
In our last proposal we were given the chance to choose two grantee defined metrics. This was a very useful exercise in defining what we would view as important metrics for the next year.

Metric	Achieved outcome	Explanation
1. # of active editors involved	225/170/230	Includes: events, wiki meetups in Oslo and Trondheim, wikigrants, contests, Wikipedia editing at universities
2. # of new editors	150/115/235	Includes: events, wiki meetups in Oslo and Trondheim, wikigrants, contests, Wikipedia editing at universities. Activities are tracked in Wikipedia Education Dashboard.
3. # of individuals involved	x/345/520	Includes: events, wiki meetups in Oslo and Trondheim, wikigrants, contests, Wikipedia editing at universities. Social media followers not included
4. # of new images/media added to Wikimedia articles/pages	30,000/27,479/35,028 Image/media usages 7,804 / 22 %	Program Community: Oslo Jazz festival 2016: 318; image use: 318 Images from different press accreditation events: 695; image use 241 Drone-project and wiki scholarship photosafari: 2 films, images 57 Wiki Loves Earth: 344 Program Glam: The National Library: 20,949; image use all images by The National Library: 5,733 National Archive of Norway: 10,132; image use: 817 Wiki Loves Monuments 2016: 1,153; image use: 347 Europenana 1914-1918: 71 letters uploaded to WikiSource, Wikimedia Commons and Transcribathon.com NTNU University Library: 327, image use 176 Program Academia: Wikipedia-editing at University of Oslo: 30 images Wikidata items added from the archive at VID Specialized University: 774
5. # of new articles added on Wikimedia projects (improved articles are not included)	x/1,084/2,260	Program Community: 65 (Armenia-editing contest) + * Weekly editing contest in total (new articles only): 961 + 916 Program Glam: 82 + 93 (weekly editing contests with Glam-partners) Program Academia: 117 + 249 Program Gender gap: 6 + 37
6. Absolute value of bytes added to or deleted from Wikimedia projects	x/7,638,719/10,321,140	Program Community: Weekly editing contests: Absolute sum 6,456,140 + 3,735,000 Program Glam: 67,800 + 64,600 (weekly editing contests with Glam-partners + Europeana 1914-1918) Program Academia: Absolute sum 1,163,400 + 96,000 Program Gender Gap: Absolute sum 19,179 + 18,230

Telling your program stories - all programs[edit]

Please tell the story of each of your programs included in your proposal. This is your chance to tell your story by using any additional metrics (beyond global metrics) that are relevant to your context, beyond the global metrics above. You should be reporting against the targets you set at the beginning of the year throughout the year. We have provided a template here below for you to report against your targets, but you are welcome to include this information in another way. Also, if you decided not to do a program that was included in your proposal or added a program not in the proposal, please explain this change. More resources for storytelling are at the end of this form. Here are some ways to tell your story.

We encourage you to share your successes and failures and what you are learning. Please also share why are these successes, failures, or learnings are important in your context. Reference learning patterns or other documentation.
Make clear connections between your offline activities and online results, as applicable. For example, explain how your education program activities is leading to quality content on Wikipedia.
We encourage you to tell your story in different ways by using videos, sound files, images (photos and infographics, e.g.), compelling quotes, and by linking directly to work you produce. You may highlight outcomes, learning, or metrics this way.
We encourage you to continue using dashboards, progress bars, and scorecards that you have used to illustrate your progress in the past, and to report consistently over time.
You are welcome to use the table below to report on any metrics or measures relevant to your program. These may or may not include the global metrics you put in the overview section above. You can also share your progress in another way if you do not find a table like this useful.

Target	Last year (if applicable)	Progress (at end of Q2)	Progress (at end of Q4)	Comments
Example	Example	Example	Example	Example

Overall impact

Community
We have the last funding period improved the volunteer engagement in the organization and the impact of our work. FDC has previously had concerns about programs being led by staff alone and that decision on what programs pursued may be driven by staff. This last year we have worked a lot on improving the volunteer engagement and responding to ideas from the community.

The mass uploads made by our Glam partners have been very well received and appreciated by active editors who wish to use the material in relevant articles. We have tried to focus on projects that involve volunteers more, are on-wiki or organized by volunteers or collaboratively by volunteers and staff; we have wiki meetups, wiki grants (microgrants), editathons, The Wikipedia Library, photo accreditation, the drone project and more.

We feel that we now have a solid organization with an improved reputation, and more members. A COI policy has been discussed and added to the board instructions and a section in the ED’s job description. We have also implemented a safe space policy, and created a page with tips for contributors who write about their employers. We have also made a communication plan for our communication work.

Challenges we have faced and are continuing to work on include reaching and keeping new editors. As is the case for many Wikimedia communities, there is an editor decline also in the Norwegian Wikipedias, and we have not yet found a way to reverse this trend. We are also struggling to find meaningful ways to support volunteers in their day-to-day work. The best community–organization relationships have often come from face-to-face meetings with volunteers and there is a threat that this will make our work even more Oslo-based. We are continuously trying to get wiki meetups started in other cities, but we are depending on volunteer initiatives and help to make this happen.

National and international partnerships
When it comes to partnerships, we have decided to pursue fewer, but more long-term partnerships. This has led to us being seen as a stable partner which is able to follow through, making us a respected and recognized organization, as the FDC has also pointed out.

The gender gap has become an integrated part of all our programs because of heavy support both from our partners and the positive media attention that the gender gap issue raises. It feels like the society at large is concerned about Wikipedia's gender gap, and sees it as an important issue to solve.

Wikipedia is a popular and well known web site and the the international network of Wikimedia and Wikipedia is attractive to partners. Interwiki links makes our content available to readers and contributors in other languages and partners are very positive to the possibility of dissemination of knowledge on the wikimedia-projects. We get more and more inquiries about the use of Wikidata and are very excited about how we can use Wikidata in both our Glam program and in the Sami project.

A disadvantage we're facing when it comes to partnerships is that we are Oslo-based, which can lead to some missed opportunities from potential partners in other parts of the country. It does make sense for us to be based in the capital, since there is a large number of national institutions located here, but there are opportunities available elsewhere that are harder to achieve because of this. Another disadvantage is that many of our partnerships are based on certain people within these partner organizations/institutions, so if they become sick, quit or retire, it means we have to re-build relationships with someone new.

When it comes to partnerships on an international level this has been one of our prioritizations this last year, in addition to community involvement. Having 1,7, and now 2,3 FTE, compared to 1,4 FTE gives us more time to join international Wikimedia meetings and conferences. This has been very important for us because it gives us the chance to learn from other chapters, get input and new perspectives and have different go to persons in different networks. Because of the governance issues Wikimedia Norge struggled with previously we had very much a national focus on our work, but with these issues resolved we can have a different approach to our work. And hopefully we have valuable learnings to share with others as well which we have tried in co writing two different Learning patterns, one about the Armenian-Norwegian writing contest and one about hosting a Conference workshop to help kickstart a project on a smaller language Wikipedia.

We have chosen to support (financially) different international events that we benefit from, but don’t have the resources or stability to organize ourselves. We gave Wikimedia UK a financial contribution to the organization of the pre conference to the Celtic Knot Conference. The train the trainers event at the pre conference gave us the opportunity to train a volunteer to have the skills to do wikipedia-editing trainings at higher education institutions. We have also supported The Wikimedia Diversity Conference financially and helped out with preparations for the event.

During travels our office will often be closed and we struggle to keep work for not piling up. Our program work we can plan around travels, but some administrative tasks needs to be handled day by day. By making detailed half years plan we try to plan our work the best we can. A summary is posted on our wiki.

Funding
We rely heavily on APG-funding, which is a big concern in Wikimedia Norge’s staff assessments. In 2015–2016 we we spend a lot of applying for funding, with no luck. The last year, 2016–2017 we have followed FDC’s advice on achieving impact over diversifying funds. This has given us more time and resources to do activities with high outcomes. We strongly agree that we need to diversify our funding, and believe we have the best chances to so with partners. We will work on two application in this funding period, in one of them Wikimedia Armenia has given us very valuable support by writing on endorsement letter on behalf of Wikimedia Armenia and one endorsement letter written by one of their Glam partners. Applying for funding with partners will have an additional upside besides money: we will do valuable networking and strengthen the relationship with partners working together on writing applications.

A challenge for WMNO will always be that the high salary and cost of living levels in Norway makes our impact measured per dollar comparatively weaker than in many other countries.

Wikimedia Norge’s development from 2014–2017: Number of FTE, APG-funding (NOK) and WMNO’s budgeting

Year	FTE	APG-funding	Budgeted revenues and expenses
2013–2014	0	285,000	Budgeted revenues: 1 532 500 expenses: 1,515,000
2014–2015	1,6	1,295,000	Budgeted revenues: 3 370 000 expenses: 3,327,000
2015–2016	1,6 FTE till June / 1,3 FTE from August	1,230,000	Budgeted revenues: 1,238,000 expenses: 1,202,332
2016–2017	From August 2016: 1,7 FTE	1 610 000	Budgeted revenues: 1,740,000 expenses: 1,710,507
2017–2018	From July 2017: 2,3 FTE	1,850,000	Budgeted revenues: 2,022,000 expenses: 1,995,000
2018–2018		APG-funding: We wrote in our last APG-proposal that we will not apply for more than 1 850 000 in funding as long as we haven’t been granted Norwegian funding

More details about Wikimedia Norge's work is shared here:

Quarterly staff reports in English

Program 1 Community support

Strengthn and support the collaborations between community, partners and organization

Concert image of the artist Solange (image used on 25 different Wikipedias). WMNO applies for photo accreditations for editors
Wiki meet up after Europeana 1914-1918 workshop at The Arts Council
Harald Søby and Astrid Carlsen at the Celtic Conference, Edinburgh 2017
Film made as part of our Drone project for editors

Highlights from 2016–2017[edit]

Our community work during this year has been focused on the objectives set out in our APG proposal, namely bettering the collaboration between our communities, partners and Wikimedia Norge; offering useful support for our community members in their work; and being an organization both editors and external partners want to contact to discuss ideas and potential collaborations. Volunteers are involved in running the wiki grants, The Wikipedia Library, the Drone project, writing contest like the one we did with Armenia and organizing Wiki Loves Monuments and editing trainings at universities.

Community manager

Last August we hired our first Community Manager, Jon Harald Søby. He has been a Wikipedia contributor since 2005, and has contributed extensively to especially the Norwegian Bokmål Wikipedia and Wikidata, and is an ingrained part of the Norwegian and international Wikimedia communities, having had several volunteer positions over the years. Hiring him has helped bridge the perceived gap between the community and the organization.

His existing Wikimedia experience has helped us be able to achieve many things that we didn’t know how to do before, and has helped streamline many of our processes. During 2016 and 2017 he held a 40 % position, working two days a week.

User survey
As a first step in this work, we conducted a survey in November 2016 targeting organization members and active contributors to the Wikimedia projects in Norway, specifically targeting the English, Norwegian Bokmål and Norwegian Nynorsk editions. The survey was conducted via a CentralNotice campaign, and we had a little more than 100 responses, which may not seem that high, but when you compare it to the number of active contributors to the Norwegian-language projects, it constitutes a decent percentage. The survey has had a good impact on our priorities since, and has helped form a foundation for our new strategy talks. The survey was conducted in three languages: English, Norwegian Bokmål and Norwegian Nynorsk.

Contests and #faktajakt

During this period we also organized Wiki Loves Monuments for the sixth time, again in collaboration with The Directorate for Cultural Heritage, and organized #faktajakt, a localized edition of the #1lib1ref campaign. As part of this, we translated the Citation Hunt tool into Norwegian Bokmål and Nynorsk. #faktajakt was done by an intern, Sabine Rønsen. She wrote an article about the campaign in the journal Bibliotekaren, page 20. and also a blog post on Wikimedia Norge's blog.

In December 2016 we organized a month long on Wikipedia editing contest together with Wikikmedia Armenia. We are very happy to bring more international collaborations to our community work, the collaboration with Armenia being one example, read this Wikimedia Foundation blog post about it, and the Wikimedia Diversity Conference being another, see the Gender Gap section below. Together with Wikimedia Armenia we have written a Learning pattern about organizing the writing contest. In Norway we included both active editors and Glam partners in the jury work, since the contest was about quality content and not quantity. The Armenian winner visited Norway in June, and the Norwegian winner visited Armenia in July. Images from their visits are uploaded here. In this year's Wiki Loves Monuments we asked one Armenian editor to be part of the jury. An easy way to continue our cross chapter collaboration. In March 2018 we will do new writing contest in Armenia and Norway with the aim of writing missing biographies about Norwegian and Armenian women.

After the journey I feel that I miss several of the great people I met in Armenia, not to mention the country and the city itself. Wikimedia Armenia have been incredibly hospitable, picking me up at six in the morning and showing me everything worth seeing in the city.
— User:Telaneo, blog post Wikimedia Norge

Wikimedia Norge has sponsored several weekly editing contests with prizes or we have asked Glam partners to sponsor prizes, for example this contest done in collaboration with The Sogn og Fjordane County Library written about on our blog. The contests are a great way of involving glam partners in Wikipedia, as long as we explain to them beforehand that they can not expect or ask for any specific content. We learned this after some contest where very few participated and the glam partner who had sponsored the prizes and were hoping for content relevant to their institutions work were disappointed. It's impossible to predict if 5 or 100 new articles will be written during a contest. Many editors are very polite, and if they win a prize in a contest with very few contributions they will ask us to save the prize for another contest - wikilove!

Images
Wikimedia Norge applies for photo accreditations on behalf of commons photographers. Almost all Norwegian music festivals have granted accreditation and this has resulted in high quality images on Commons with high image usages on many Wikipedias, like thos contribution from the Oslo Jazz Festival written about on our blog. If the festival has granted permission before, the Commons photographer can apply for permission themselves. Commons photographers have also taken images at other big events in Norway and via the village pump other editors have helped out with identifying people, see for example this thread on the village pump.

The drone project is a small project we are trying out. There are a lot of laws and regulations to follow using the drone, so this is a test project. So far media added from this project can be seen in this category. One editor has written about his drone safari sponsored by a wikigrant from Wikimedia Norge on our blog. This work is one area where Wikimedia Norge can help editors in a good way and we encourage photographers to contact us about photo accreditation whenever we get a chance, because not many do so far. For example we where granted photo accreditation to The Nobel Peace Center when last year's laureate visited the exhibition at the Nobel Peace Center, but unfortunately no photographers were able to go because it was during day time.

wikimedia.no
We also got a brand new website in late 2016, meant to be our face to the world; previously the domain redirected to our wiki, which will see continued use as place to keep board meeting minutes, budget and accounting, staff reports per quarter, documentation for our general assembly etc. In other words all information and documentation members of Wikimedia Norge should have available about the governance of the organization. The wikimedia.no website allows new members to register in an easy way and the contact form makes it easy to reach out to the staff at Wikimedia Norge. In the last year inquiries have tripled, from about 20 in 2015–2016 to over 60 in 2016–2017. The most asked questions are:

I would like to contribute, how do I edit Wikipedia?
This or that needs to be corrected in a Wikipedia article
Why were my edits reverted/articles deleted?

We answer everybody within a day, give links to tutorials and information on Wikipedia on how to contribute, the mentor page, and explains that Wikimedia Norge staff does not edit Wikipedia as part of our day jobs. The website also has an option for donations. Wikimedia Norge should be able to raise more money from private donations, but we need to plan for how we can work on this next year. The feedback on the website has been positive. Being a small chapter we focused on making a website that was easy to update and not to ambitious to maintain. The website has a calendar, news post (short post written by staff members) and blog posts written by community members and partners. We have also recently added a plug in on the website for the member register (CiviCRM) and will tell more about this in our progress report.

Multilingual organization
Although our main working language is Norwegian Bokmål, we strive to be a multilingual organization. Our bylaws say we are to work on improving the Wikimedia projects in Norway, with an emphasis on those in Norwegian Bokmål, Norwegian Nynorsk and Northern Sami, but one of the critisisms that was raised in the user survey was that there is an undue focus on the Bokmål Wikipedia. Because of this we have put an extra emphasis on trying to have most of our resources translated into both English and Norwegian Nynorsk, with Northern Sami efforts underway. Because of this, our website has been fully translated from Norwegian Bokmål into Norwegian Nynorsk and English, and partly into Northern Sami. We also had the Translate extension installed on our wiki, which means that a lot of informational pages now have texts in Bokmål, Nynorsk and English, helping us becoming a more multilingual organization and be more accessible for potential members and partners who aren't fluent in Norwegian.

As part of the education program, we have also started using the Wiki Edu Foundation's Dashboard solution, which was also translated into Norwegian Bokmål, which significantly helps us track numbers for the global metrics.

Newsletters and social media
In order to improve our visibility amongst contributors, we have started offering our newsletter on-wiki (using the global MassMessage extension) in addition to by e-mail; previously the newsletters were only sent by e-mail to our members, but by posting them on-wiki as well it becomes accessible to non-members too. The newsletter is distributed to all 77 members by e-mail (except for the ones who have opted out), and additionally to 23 pages on-wiki. The on-wiki newsletters are all available in English, Norwegian Bokmål and Norwegian Nynorsk.

To find out how we work with communication targeted at different stakeholders we have made a communication plan (currently in Norwegian Bokmål only). Each quarter we will summarize our communication work. The following table is from 15 September 2017 when we did the first summarization for the period 1 June 2017-15 September 2017:

Platform	Numbers	Comments
Wikimedia.no		Website views: June 410; July 302; August 631 Number of blog posts: 5 Number of writers: 5
Newsletter	By e-mail: 75 recipients On-wiki: 23 recipients \|\| Newsletters sent out on September 1 on-wiki and by e-mail
Members	77
Facebook	1719 likes	18 total posts 5 English-language posts Top 3 posts: Post about the Europeana 1914–1918 project, post about visiting the National Archive (in Norwegian and English), post linking to a blog post, travel letter from Jerevan (in Norwegian and English)
Instagram	269 followers	6 posts
Twitter	2005 followers	The topic we tweeted about the most was the Celtic Knot Conference

Although we have done a lot of work on communication the feedback from active editors are that they don't use Facebook or subscribe to our newsletter. They prefer personal e-mails, which we see gives better results, but this is a type of communication that does not really scale or reach new editors.

Thank you so much for a great newsletter – you are doing an amazing job!
— Editor and member of Wikimedia Norge

Wikidata and Glam partners
In April/May we had our first venture into contributing data to Wikidata en masse. Previously Wikimedia Norge didn't have staff members with the technical skills to do work like this. This is also collaboration that can not be solely based on volunteer engagement. We were approached by VID Specialized University, which manages a database of Norwegian missionaries, which wanted to release their data onto Wikidata. Data on 773 Norwegian missionaries were imported from this archive; some data was connected to existing articles (i.e. missionaries that already had articles in Wikipedias), while the majority led to the creation of new Wikidata entities. This work was a useful learning challenge, and helped prepare our upcoming collaboration with the National Library, where we will import information on all authors published in Norway, and import the entire Sami-language bibliography. Jon Harald Søby will also attend WikidataCon in November.

It's great that Wikimedia Norge now has staff members with in depth knowledge about Wikidata. I look forward to the planned meet up on Wikidata for active editors in November where we can meet, learn more and have discussions about editing.
— Editor and member of Wikimedia Norge

International collaborations
The last year Wikimedia Norge has had the time to be more involved in international cross chapter collaborations, meetings and conferences. This have improved our potential for impact at scale, as commented upon by in the staff assessment. We have an ongoing collaboration with Wikimedia Armenia (read the learning pattern from the contest), we joined Wikimedia UK's Celtic Knot Conference July 2017 as well as the pre-conference (read the Learning pattern from the conference) and also financially supported the Train-the-trainers event. We joined the strategy meeting for EDs in Lausanne in January, the Glam meeting at Unesco in Paris in February, the Wikimedia Conference in Berlin in April and Wikimania in Montréal in August.

Lessons learned[edit]

It's difficult to scale volunteer involvement and it will take time for an organization our size. A post on the village pump is not enough, we need to get to know editors, find out how and if we can give support and organize the support together with other volunteers or partners. This is a slow process, but one of our most important tasks.
We need to pay attention to both volunteer and staff burn out and concentrate on the work we know can give impact. One of the most important lessons we have learned, and reported on before, is to move our work from physical meetings and workshops to on wiki work – it's easier to organize and easier to make more editors get involved. We are looking into using Phabricator for projects to be more transparent and involve more volunteers.

Impact[edit]

With a community manager among staff member we have managed to increase volunteer engagement by doing projects like the Armenia-Norge on wiki editing contest and the Drone project. For the first year we can report on results from projects like WikiSource and Wikidata. With more staff members, 1,7 last year, we have had the time to join every wiki workshop organized by community members and international meetings and conferences to learn from other chapters and share our work. For the Sami project this has been crucial (we will report on this in our progress report). Answering a request from the user survey we will try out technical wiki meetups for active editors, starting November 2018.

Target	Last year (if applicable)	Progress (at end of Q2)	Progress (at end of Q4)	Comments
Give out 8 x 8,000 NOK in wikigrants. 4 in September 2016 and 4 in February 2017	Spring 2015: 4	2	4	Wikigrants, info in English, see our blog for blog post from all grantees. Some grants are moved to the Wikipedia Library project
6 wiki workshops in Oslo for active editors organized bimonthly by the community, costs covered by Wikimedia Norge. Test the same in one other city as well	3	4	7	Wiki meetups in Oslo and Trondheim, project page for wiki meet ups
Include 30 active editors in our programs and ask for support online, via the village pump or on project pages as mentors.		37	65	One challenge is to continually try to find new active editors to involve. The wiki workshops have been very important to get to know more people.
Organize a month long online editing contest in November in collaboration with Wikimedia Armenia. The winner from each country gets to travel to Armenia / Norway		Done		Contest page
Sponsor, or get sponsored, 6 prizes in the weekly online contest	7	4	9	Prizes sponsored by The Directorate for Cultural Heritage, The Research Council, The Nobel Peace Center, The National Gallery
Triple the number of Wikimedia Norge memberships from 2015 till 2016	22	71	79	The new Wikimedia Norge website (in Norwegian Bokmål, Norwegian Nynorsk and English) with information about Wikimedia Norge's work, and registration form for membership has been essential in reaching our target of more members and in keeping partnerships for the coming years.
Conduct a survey among 2,000 editors and readers on Wikipedia with help from WMF in November-December 2016		Done		Published on Meta (in Norwegian Bokmål, Norwegian Nynorsk and English)
Print material about How to contribute to Wikimedia Commons and on free licenses			Done
Support The Free Knowledge Advocacy Group EU by using revenues from membership fees			Done	Blog post
NEW: Wiki Loves Earth, 1000 images uploaded			Done	The contest was organized by our board and volunteers. 344 images were uploaded, contest page