Grants talk:IdeaLab/De la Historia no contada a la Wikipedia masiva

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki

Eligibility confirmed, Inspire Campaign[edit]

This Inspire Grant proposal is under review!

We've confirmed your proposal is eligible for the Inspire Campaign review. Please feel free to ask questions and make changes to this proposal as discussions continue during this community comments period.

The committee's formal review begins on 6 April 2015, and grants will be announced at the end of April. See the schedule for more details.

Questions? Contact us at grants(at)wikimedia.org.

Aggregated feedback from the committee for De la Historia no contada a la Wikipedia masiva[edit]

Scoring rubric Score
(A) Impact potential
  • Does it have the potential to increase gender diversity in Wikimedia projects, either in terms of content, contributors, or both?
  • Does it have the potential for online impact?
  • Can it be sustained, scaled, or adapted elsewhere after the grant ends?
6.7
(B) Community engagement
  • Does it have a specific target community and plan to engage it often?
  • Does it have community support?
5.2
(C) Ability to execute
  • Can the scope be accomplished in the proposed timeframe?
  • Is the budget realistic/efficient ?
  • Do the participants have the necessary skills/experience?
5.7
(D) Measures of success
  • Are there both quantitative and qualitative measures of success?
  • Are they realistic?
  • Can they be measured?
5.2
Additional comments from the Committee:
  • Appreciate the involvement of women from Venezuela and focus on diversity.
  • Like the idea of building community in Venezuela through an individual who seems well-connected, but the database idea is not clear.
  • Recommend starting with more proven models of content creation, such as building a list of content gaps and then working to create articles that address those gaps.
  • This idea has potential, but the proposal is under-developed.
  • Potential offline community at the university and promising partnership with the Center of Women Studies, but no engagement from the Wikimedia community.
  • The measures of success are generally the right idea, but they need to be more specific about the number of people they hope to engage and amount of content to be created.
  • Overall, given the reasonable budget, capable grantee, and possibility of building Wikipedia presence in a geographic region not normally targeted by grants make it worth funding.

Inspire funding decision[edit]

This project has not been selected for an Inspire Grant at this time.

We love that you took the chance to creatively improve the Wikimedia movement. The committee has reviewed this proposal and not recommended it for funding, but we hope you'll continue to engage in the program. Please drop by the IdeaLab to share and refine future ideas!

Comments regarding this decision:
Thank you for engaging in the Inspire Campaign! We’re excited about supporting women editors in Venezuela and would like to have further discussions on how we can make this proposal actionable via a Project and Event Grant or other support. Looking forward to more conversations with you in coming weeks when you have time to continue discussions.

Next steps:

  1. Review the feedback provided on your proposal and to ask for any clarifications you need using this talk page.
  2. Visit the IdeaLab to continue developing this idea and share any new ideas you may have.
  3. To reapply with this project in the future, please make updates based on the feedback provided in this round before resubmitting it for review in a new round.
  4. Check the Individual Engagement Grant schedule for the next open call to submit proposals or the Project and Event Grant pages if your idea is to support expenses for offline events - we look forward to helping you apply for a grant in the future.
Questions? Contact us at grants(_AT_)wikimedia.org