Jump to content

Low Saxon/language and spelling conflict policy/Afstemmen

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki

This is the proposal for a language and spelling conflict policy for Low Saxon Wikisource (and other future shared Low Saxon projects), as requested as prerequisite for the creation of the project by the language subcommittee.

Veurslag

[edit]
English:
  1. Everyone is encouraged to contribute, independent of their personal writing style or dialect. For the content pages, contributors should take note of spelling policies that may exist for the content they are editing.
  2. The interface and meta texts (templates, categories etc.) will be made available in a common spelling devised to facilitate written communication between Low Saxon speakers from different regions. The interface and meta texts will use common spelling by default, but will be made available in all the other important alternate spellings too.
  3. In discussions involving people whose local spelling systems vary widely, contributions may make use of these various systems as long as mutual understanding is not impeded scienter. In case participants have difficulty understanding each other, they are encouraged to use the common spelling, or administrators will make the text available in common spelling or the spelling fitting best to make the text understandable to the participants in the discussion.
Plattdüütsch:
  1. Elkeen schall geern bidragen, egal wat för en Schrievwies oder Dialekt he bruukt. För de Inholdssieden schöölt de Brukers aver acht geven op de Schrievregeln, de dat för disse Soort Inhold geven mag.
  2. De Systemnarichten un Metatexten (Vörlagen, Kategorien etc.) sünd in en allgemene Schrievwies, de dor op utricht is, dat dat Verstahn in de Schrift för Neddersassisch-Snackers ut verscheden Regionen lichter fallt. De Systemnarichten un Metatexten bruukt disse allgemene Schrievwies as Standard, aver warrt ok in all de annern wichtigen Schrievwiesen bereidstellt.
  3. In Diskuschonen, an de Lüüd mit ganz verscheden Schrivwiesen deelnehmt, dröfft de Bidrääg geern all Schrievwiesen bruken, solang man dat Verstahn nich sworer maakt warrt as nödig. Wenn de Lüüd, de diskuteert, dat swoor hebbt, sik gegensiedig to verstahn, denn warrt anraden, dat se de allgemene Schrievwies bruukt oder dat Administraters helpt un den Text in allgemene Schrievwies verföögbor maakt oder de Schrievwies, de opbest passt, dat de Lüüd allens verstaht.
Nedersaksisch:
  1. Iederene kan metwoarkn as'e det wil. t Maakt nit oet wat vuur ne skriefwieze of dialekt hee gebroekt, mear vuur de inhooldsziedn mutn de skrievers op de skriefregels achtn, dee at dr beent/zeent vuur dit soort inhoold.
  2. De Systeemberichtn en Metatekstn (Kattegeriejn, etc) beent/zeent in ne algemene skriefwieze, den dr op ericht is det t verstoan van t skrift vuur Neersassies-sprekkers oet verskeaidene Regioos makkeliker wörd. De systeemberichtn en Metatekstn gebroekt disse algemene skriefwieze as standaard, mear wordt ook in alle aandere belangrieke skriefwiezn an eweandt.
  3. In Diskussies woeran leu met kets verskeaidene skriefwiezn deelnemt, magnt alle skriefwiezes ebroekt wordn, zolange det t verstoan nit zoerder maakt as neudig. As de leu dee diskussieert, t zoer hebt um mekoar te verstoan, dan wörd an eroadn det ze de algemene skriefwies gebroekt, of de skriefwies den at beaide partiejn t beste verstoat.

Veur

[edit]
  1. --Bolingbroke 10:44, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. --Iwoelbern 23:41, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. --::Slomox:: >< 00:15, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. --Woolters 11:33, 6 February 2009 (UTC) Ik passe mie aait al n betn an as ik hier skrieve. Woolters 11:33, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --Grönneger 1 12:19, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --Servien 12:47, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. --79.204.67.106 13:30, 6 February 2009 (UTC) aka Eastfrisian[reply]
  8. --Ni'jluuseger 14:02, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9. --Droadnaegel 17:11, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Erwin(85) 11:11, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  11. --IP-Los 15:45, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  12. --Hardcore-Mike 18:26, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Erik Warmelink 18:18, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  14. -- Zylbath 10:38, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tegen

[edit]