Meta:Requests for adminship/Juliancolton
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.
- Juliancolton (talk • contribs • count • logs • page moves • block log • CA • email)
Dear community,
I am nominating Juliancolton for adminship here on Meta, this user is already a administrator on multiple projects and active on the SBL here on Meta.
Granting this great user adminship would mean that he would be able to help with the SBL, and we need to accept all the help we can get there, it will also mean he can not only revert the vandals here on Meta but can also delete and block them
I don't see any red flags for this user, I hope you all agree with me and support this request.
Huib talk 18:12, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Sure, I'll accept. I'm not the most active user on meta, but I can help out where needed. Thanks for the nomination! :) –Juliancolton | Talk 18:14, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - Because it would be kind of strange to oppose on my own nomination :) Huib talk 18:16, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - A very trusted user on several projects. He has my trust. Barras 18:15, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Fully trust this editor. Majorly talk 18:42, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - NW (Talk) 18:59, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Yup I trust this user. -Djsasso 19:01, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Per above. – Katerenka (talk • contribs) 00:08, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - Maximillion Pegasus 00:10, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - I trust Julian. Tiptoety talk 00:12, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Has my trust and already is a respectable administrator on en.wikipedia and simple.wikipedia. Razorflame 00:18, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --.snoopy. ✉ 10:24, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Yessir. Pmlineditor ∞ 10:25, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Trustworthy, whynot Jamesofur 12:31, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --Dferg 21:28, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Good Luck. — Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 22:08, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Ar son - of course :) - Alison ❤ 22:13, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support, certainly. :) Cirt (talk) 00:46, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Sure. J.delanoygabsadds 18:03, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- support —DerHexer (Talk) 19:29, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --Kanjy 09:41, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --თოგო (D) 12:55, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support MBisanz talk 14:35, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Aude 03:56, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Voting closed, user promoted. --FiliP ██ 21:22, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks to everyone who participated! –Juliancolton | Talk 21:27, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]