Meta:Requests for adminship/Kylu

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.

Done.

Kylu[edit]

At least 100 valid contributions on another Wikimedia project: Many thousands, see my userpage for multiple editcounter links.
At least 100 valid contributions on the Meta-Wiki: Check
Administrator of another project: w:en:User:Kylu
Meta userpage: User:Kylu, with a matrix of links to other projects.
Valid contact address: Special:Emailuser/Kylu, active and validated.
Have read (and understand) Meta admin policy: Yes.

I'm an OTRS member and a meta editor since May 2006, and I've noticed that there is always work for administrators on here (Deleteme and Requests for Deletion, Interwiki map maintenance, the like) and I've found myself here more often than I've expected. I'm on IRC frequently when editing (freenode, nick Kylu) and am available at a moment's notice if needed. ~Kylu (u|t) 05:18, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support Excellent, trustworthy Wikimedian, competent administrator on en. riana_dzasta 06:09, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Meets the above criteria, and will be a great help as an admin. Majorly (talk) 12:03, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
ok--Nick1915 -^{all you want} 12:09, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks good to me. Adambro 12:10, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support mafeesh moshkla --The Joke النكتة‎ 12:19, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support goodness yes! I was just urging her to stand for admin here last night. ++Lar: t/c 13:01, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --M/ 14:20, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yes, meets criteria and trustworthy. Cbrown1023 talk 20:21, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thought she already was one. Seriously!! ;-) Trustworthy and a hard worker. Certain that Meta will benefit from her having admin tools. FloNight 20:36, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Unlikely to delete the Main Page. Will make a good admin. - Tangotango 01:54, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yes, does good work. Pschemp 02:21, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support - absolutely :) - Ali-oops 06:25, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --.anaconda 07:12, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sounds good. Mathmo 12:02, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Epousesquecido 15:35, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support. WjBscribe 19:32, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support – a great sysop on WP:EN (and so nice as well!) ... I'm sure Meta would be pleased to have the same services ;-) ~ Anthøny 20:28, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
of course support --Thogo (talk) 23:32, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support good admin, know from en: xaosflux ^Talk 23:52, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Kylu as a true asset to the Wikimedia community at large (not just any one project). Whole-hearted Support. EVula // talk // 02:18, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Trusted with the tools. --Meno25 15:04, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Marbot 16:56, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cary Bass ^demandez 12:34, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support NoSeptember 14:23, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --.snoopy. AKA dario vet · (talk) 16:04, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A. B. ^(talk) 22:13, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support without hesitation. I have a private disagreement with her over something, but there's absolutely no doubt in my mind that she's trustworthy and that she wants what's best for the project. ElinorD 09:27, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support per above. --Isis4563 20:11, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support it will be a good thing to have Kylu as an administrator here on Meta. Acalamari 18:12, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Closed: Kylu is now a sysop. Majorly (talk) 00:20, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]