A committee member provided the following comment:
This request clearly needs to be rejected; this "language" is not sufficiently distinct from English (in fact, it is English) and has no ISO code. --MF-W 00:08, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The community needs to develop an active test project; it must remain active until approval (automated statistics, recent changes). It is generally considered active if the analysis lists at least three active, not-grayed-out editors listed in the sections for the previous few months.
"Wikipedia talk" (the discussion namespace of the project namespace)
Default is "no". Preferably, files should be uploaded to Commons.
If you want, you can enable local file uploading, either by any user ("yes") or by administrators only ("admin"). Notes: (1) This setting can be changed afterwards. The setting can only be "yes" or "admin" at approval if the test creates an Exemption Doctrine Policy (EDP) first. (2) Files on Commons can be used on all Wikis. (3) Uploading fair-use images is not allowed on Commons (more info). (4) Localisation to your language may be insufficient on Commons.
English: Anglish is a constructed language based on English like Simple English, with only germanic words and almost no word borrowed from other languages.
Anglish: Anglish is a madeup speech grounded on English like Eath English, with only Theedish words and almost no word borrowed from other speechs.
Anglish has no ISO code. Besides, we have enough Anglic Wikipedias (ang: Old English, en: Modern English, sco: (Modern) Scots, simple: Simple English, not to mention English creoles). I don't think a pure Germanic English Wikipedia is needed. Who would read it? PiRSquared17 (talk) 11:44, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I consider Anglish and Simple English should be on equal footing. In the way you said, Who would read Latin, even Interlingua and Church Slavonic?
Yaochenwei (talk) 12:30, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Latin and Church Slavonic Wikipedias might not have been accepted today, as dead languages aren't allowed to be created anymore. Simple English was created before the current language policy, but the language committee says that creation of some simple projects is allowed, but only for well known simplifications where there is a well-defined standard. PiRSquared17 (talk) 12:33, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
There has already been a community for Anglish and I think the sufficiency of anglic Wikipedia can not be an insurmountable obstacle for the creation of a new anglic Wikipedia.Yaochenwei (talk) 12:50, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]