Discuss the creation of this language project on this page. Votes will be ignored when judging the proposal. Please provide arguments or reasons and be prepared to defend them (see the Language proposal policy).
The language committee needs to verify the language is eligible to be approved.
Check that the project does not already exist (see list).
Ensure the requested language is sufficiently unique that it could not exist on a more general wiki.
Ensure that there are a sufficient number of native editors of that language to merit an edition in that language.
The community needs to develop an active test project; it must remain active until approval (automated statistics, recent changes). It is generally considered active if the analysis lists at least three active, not-grayed-out editors listed in the sections for the previous few months.
Item about the language at Wikidata. It would normally include the Wikimedia language code, name of the language, etc. Please complete at Wikidata if needed.
"Wikipedia talk" (the discussion namespace of the project namespace)
Enable uploads
no
Default is "no". Preferably, files should be uploaded to Commons.
If you want, you can enable local file uploading, either by any user ("yes") or by administrators only ("admin"). Notes: (1) This setting can be changed afterwards. The setting can only be "yes" or "admin" at approval if the test creates an Exemption Doctrine Policy (EDP) first. (2) Files on Commons can be used on all Wikis. (3) Uploading fair-use images is not allowed on Commons (more info). (4) Localisation to your language may be insufficient on Commons.
The language exists on the border with Ukraine in the Belgorod Region, I can give confirmation. It is spoken by about 3,000 people in the villages.KittenBroEeev (talk) 17:28, 15 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
This isn't even going to be considered if there is no valid ISO 639-1 or 639-3 language code. (See "Language code" is the "Proposal" box above — "belgorod" is not a valid code.) - dcljr (talk) 08:19, 16 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose Same situation as Dcljr, per LPP, this request is a violation of #2 and #3:
The language must ordinarily have a valid ISO 639 1–3 code
The language must be sufficiently unique that it could not coexist on a more general wiki. In most cases, this excludes regional dialects and different written forms of the same language.
It does not have code in ISO, that is the problem(but if it necessary, i can try to add it into ISO through the management(admins?) of ISO standart. About originality of language. I can provide some songs in it and texts and you can compare it to russian or ukrainian and find out they are very differentKittenBroEeev (talk) 14:52, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
